Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects

ObjectiveTo investigate the bioequivalence and safety of the generic drug entecavir versus the original drug entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. MethodsA randomized, open, two-cycle, two-cross, fasting trial was designed and performed for 28 healthy subjects, and the subjects were given s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LIU Zhengzhi
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2020-12-01
Series:Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
Online Access:http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=11232
id doaj-cfea23966f644d4b985f83e14ad57fb1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfea23966f644d4b985f83e14ad57fb12020-12-17T10:46:42ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562020-12-01361226952699Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjectsLIU Zhengzhi0The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese MedicineObjectiveTo investigate the bioequivalence and safety of the generic drug entecavir versus the original drug entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. MethodsA randomized, open, two-cycle, two-cross, fasting trial was designed and performed for 28 healthy subjects, and the subjects were given single oral administration of the test preparation or the reference preparation at a dose of 0.5 mg in the two cycles, respectively. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure plasma concentration at 16 different time points within 72 hours after administration, and the main pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were calculated to evaluate bioequivalence. WinNonlin software was used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters and perform bioequivalence evaluation. Results After the oral administration of the test preparation or the reference preparation in the fasting state, the main geometric means (90% confidence interval) of the main pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 98.18%(91.36%-105.50%), 101.97%(98.32%-105.74%), and 103.07%(96.30%-110.32%), respectively, all of which were within the range of 80.00%-125.00%. After the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ were transformed by natural logarithm, the variance analysis was carried out. The P value test results showed that the difference between the dosing weeks (P<0.05), the dosing sequence and differences in formulation factors (P>0.05). Meet the criteria of bioequivalence. ConclusionThe two preparations are bioequivalent and have good safety in healthy Chinese subjects.http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=11232
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author LIU Zhengzhi
spellingShingle LIU Zhengzhi
Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
author_facet LIU Zhengzhi
author_sort LIU Zhengzhi
title Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
title_short Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
title_full Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
title_fullStr Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
title_full_unstemmed Bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
title_sort bioequivalence and safety of entecavir tablets in healthy chinese subjects
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
series Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
issn 1001-5256
1001-5256
publishDate 2020-12-01
description ObjectiveTo investigate the bioequivalence and safety of the generic drug entecavir versus the original drug entecavir tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. MethodsA randomized, open, two-cycle, two-cross, fasting trial was designed and performed for 28 healthy subjects, and the subjects were given single oral administration of the test preparation or the reference preparation at a dose of 0.5 mg in the two cycles, respectively. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure plasma concentration at 16 different time points within 72 hours after administration, and the main pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were calculated to evaluate bioequivalence. WinNonlin software was used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters and perform bioequivalence evaluation. Results After the oral administration of the test preparation or the reference preparation in the fasting state, the main geometric means (90% confidence interval) of the main pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 98.18%(91.36%-105.50%), 101.97%(98.32%-105.74%), and 103.07%(96.30%-110.32%), respectively, all of which were within the range of 80.00%-125.00%. After the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ were transformed by natural logarithm, the variance analysis was carried out. The P value test results showed that the difference between the dosing weeks (P<0.05), the dosing sequence and differences in formulation factors (P>0.05). Meet the criteria of bioequivalence. ConclusionThe two preparations are bioequivalent and have good safety in healthy Chinese subjects.
url http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=11232
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzhengzhi bioequivalenceandsafetyofentecavirtabletsinhealthychinesesubjects
_version_ 1724380006182813696