Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items

A number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Yang, Midori Tokita, Akira Ishiguchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517747297
id doaj-cfe032d407ff47a4ad37138d192f3b8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfe032d407ff47a4ad37138d192f3b8d2020-11-25T04:09:08ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952018-01-01910.1177/2041669517747297Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar ItemsYi YangMidori TokitaAkira IshiguchiA number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear. In this study, we explored this issue using an individual differences approach. Observers viewed illustrations of strawberries and lollypops varying in size or orientation and performed four tasks in a within-subject design, namely mean and variance discrimination tasks with size and orientation domains. We found that the performances in the mean and variance discrimination tasks were not correlated with each other and demonstrated that extractions of the mean and variance are mediated by different representation mechanisms. In addition, we tested the relationship between performances in size and orientation domains for each summary statistic (i.e. mean and variance) and examined whether each summary statistic has distinct processes across perceptual domains. The results illustrated that statistical summary representations of size and orientation may share a common mechanism for representing the mean and possibly for representing variance. Introspections for each observer performing the tasks were also examined and discussed.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517747297
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yi Yang
Midori Tokita
Akira Ishiguchi
spellingShingle Yi Yang
Midori Tokita
Akira Ishiguchi
Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
i-Perception
author_facet Yi Yang
Midori Tokita
Akira Ishiguchi
author_sort Yi Yang
title Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
title_short Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
title_full Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
title_fullStr Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
title_full_unstemmed Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
title_sort is there a common summary statistical process for representing the mean and variance? a study using illustrations of familiar items
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2018-01-01
description A number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear. In this study, we explored this issue using an individual differences approach. Observers viewed illustrations of strawberries and lollypops varying in size or orientation and performed four tasks in a within-subject design, namely mean and variance discrimination tasks with size and orientation domains. We found that the performances in the mean and variance discrimination tasks were not correlated with each other and demonstrated that extractions of the mean and variance are mediated by different representation mechanisms. In addition, we tested the relationship between performances in size and orientation domains for each summary statistic (i.e. mean and variance) and examined whether each summary statistic has distinct processes across perceptual domains. The results illustrated that statistical summary representations of size and orientation may share a common mechanism for representing the mean and possibly for representing variance. Introspections for each observer performing the tasks were also examined and discussed.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517747297
work_keys_str_mv AT yiyang isthereacommonsummarystatisticalprocessforrepresentingthemeanandvarianceastudyusingillustrationsoffamiliaritems
AT midoritokita isthereacommonsummarystatisticalprocessforrepresentingthemeanandvarianceastudyusingillustrationsoffamiliaritems
AT akiraishiguchi isthereacommonsummarystatisticalprocessforrepresentingthemeanandvarianceastudyusingillustrationsoffamiliaritems
_version_ 1724423218980192256