Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items
A number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-01-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517747297 |
id |
doaj-cfe032d407ff47a4ad37138d192f3b8d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cfe032d407ff47a4ad37138d192f3b8d2020-11-25T04:09:08ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952018-01-01910.1177/2041669517747297Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar ItemsYi YangMidori TokitaAkira IshiguchiA number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear. In this study, we explored this issue using an individual differences approach. Observers viewed illustrations of strawberries and lollypops varying in size or orientation and performed four tasks in a within-subject design, namely mean and variance discrimination tasks with size and orientation domains. We found that the performances in the mean and variance discrimination tasks were not correlated with each other and demonstrated that extractions of the mean and variance are mediated by different representation mechanisms. In addition, we tested the relationship between performances in size and orientation domains for each summary statistic (i.e. mean and variance) and examined whether each summary statistic has distinct processes across perceptual domains. The results illustrated that statistical summary representations of size and orientation may share a common mechanism for representing the mean and possibly for representing variance. Introspections for each observer performing the tasks were also examined and discussed.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517747297 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yi Yang Midori Tokita Akira Ishiguchi |
spellingShingle |
Yi Yang Midori Tokita Akira Ishiguchi Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items i-Perception |
author_facet |
Yi Yang Midori Tokita Akira Ishiguchi |
author_sort |
Yi Yang |
title |
Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items |
title_short |
Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items |
title_full |
Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items |
title_fullStr |
Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is There a Common Summary Statistical Process for Representing the Mean and Variance? A Study Using Illustrations of Familiar Items |
title_sort |
is there a common summary statistical process for representing the mean and variance? a study using illustrations of familiar items |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
i-Perception |
issn |
2041-6695 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
A number of studies revealed that our visual system can extract different types of summary statistics, such as the mean and variance, from sets of items. Although the extraction of such summary statistics has been studied well in isolation, the relationship between these statistics remains unclear. In this study, we explored this issue using an individual differences approach. Observers viewed illustrations of strawberries and lollypops varying in size or orientation and performed four tasks in a within-subject design, namely mean and variance discrimination tasks with size and orientation domains. We found that the performances in the mean and variance discrimination tasks were not correlated with each other and demonstrated that extractions of the mean and variance are mediated by different representation mechanisms. In addition, we tested the relationship between performances in size and orientation domains for each summary statistic (i.e. mean and variance) and examined whether each summary statistic has distinct processes across perceptual domains. The results illustrated that statistical summary representations of size and orientation may share a common mechanism for representing the mean and possibly for representing variance. Introspections for each observer performing the tasks were also examined and discussed. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517747297 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yiyang isthereacommonsummarystatisticalprocessforrepresentingthemeanandvarianceastudyusingillustrationsoffamiliaritems AT midoritokita isthereacommonsummarystatisticalprocessforrepresentingthemeanandvarianceastudyusingillustrationsoffamiliaritems AT akiraishiguchi isthereacommonsummarystatisticalprocessforrepresentingthemeanandvarianceastudyusingillustrationsoffamiliaritems |
_version_ |
1724423218980192256 |