Improvement of Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection

• Main Authors: A. A. Kochish, S. A. Bozhkova, V. A. Artyukh, V. N. Liventsov, A. V. Afanas’ev, S. S. Toropov
• Format: Article
• Language: Russian
• Published: Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 2021-04-01
• Series: Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
• Subjects: hip joint; periprosthetic infection; perioperative management; thromboprophylaxis; postoperative wound drainage
• Online Access: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1566

Two-stage revision arthroplasty in chronic hip periprosthetic joint infection cases is the “gold standard” treatment. First stage debridement leads to large intraoperative and drainage blood loss using standard protocols for thromboprophylaxis and drainage of the surgical wound, which is a significant disadvantage of perioperative management of such patients.The aim of the study was to determine the effect of modified management protocol with delayed start of thromboprophylaxis and a short period of drainage on the blood loss and the effectiveness of debridement with antibiotic-impregnated spacer placement in patients with hip periprosthetic joint infection.Materials and Methods. A single-center prospective study was conducted. 90 patients underwent endoprosthesis components removal and antibiotic-impregnated spacer placement. Patients were divided into 3 groups: start of thromboprophylaxis before surgery and 3–4 days of drainage; start of thromboprophylaxis no earlier than 12 hours after surgery and 3–4 days of drainage; start of thromboprophylaxis no earlier than 12 hours after surgery and 1 day of drainage.Results. There was a statistically significant (p<0.05) decrease of drainage and total blood loss, and transfused blood volume in cases with the delayed start of thromboprophylaxis and a short period of drainage. The proposed protocol was safe for prevention of venous thromboembolic complications and did not affect the frequency of periprosthetic hip joint infection recurrence. The effectiveness of the first stage of treatment — 89%, the second stage — 99% in 1 year after rehabilitation according to the second international consensus on musculoskeletal infection criteria.Conclusion. The modified protocol of perioperative management is an effective and safe as a blood-saving strategy and can be proposed for widespread use.