Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility

Virtual agents have been widely used in human-agent collaboration work. One important problem with human-agent collaboration is the attribution of responsibility as perceived by users. We focused on the relationship between the appearance of a virtual agent and the attribution of perceived responsib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tetsuya Matsui, Atsushi Koike
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2646
id doaj-cfbc5b27508d463187cfb2247b132c67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfbc5b27508d463187cfb2247b132c672021-04-09T23:05:45ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-04-01212646264610.3390/s21082646Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived ResponsibilityTetsuya Matsui0Atsushi Koike1Faculty of Robotics and Design, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka 530-0013, JapanDepartment of Science and Technology, Seikei University, Tokyo 180-8633, JapanVirtual agents have been widely used in human-agent collaboration work. One important problem with human-agent collaboration is the attribution of responsibility as perceived by users. We focused on the relationship between the appearance of a virtual agent and the attribution of perceived responsibility. We conducted an experiment with five agents: an agent without an appearance, a human-like agent, a robot-like agent, a dog-like agent, and an angel-like agent. We measured the perceived agency and experience for each agent, and we conducted an experiment involving a sound-guessing game. In the game, participants listened to a sound and guessed what the sound was with an agent. At the end of the game, the game finished with failure, and the participants did not know who made the mistake, the participant or the agent. After the game, we asked the participants how they perceived the agents’ trustworthiness and to whom they attributed responsibility. As a result, participants attributed less responsibility to themselves when interacting with a robot-like agent than interacting with an angel-like robot. Furthermore, participants perceived the least trustworthiness toward the robot-like agent among all conditions. In addition, the agents’ perceived experience had a correlation with the attribution of perceived responsibility. Furthermore, the agents that made the participants feel their attribution of responsibility to be less were not trusted. These results suggest the relationship between agents’ appearance and perceived attribution of responsibility and new methods for designs in the creation of virtual agents for collaboration work.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2646human-agent interactionvirtual agentattribution of responsibilityhuman-machine collaborationtrustworthiness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tetsuya Matsui
Atsushi Koike
spellingShingle Tetsuya Matsui
Atsushi Koike
Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility
Sensors
human-agent interaction
virtual agent
attribution of responsibility
human-machine collaboration
trustworthiness
author_facet Tetsuya Matsui
Atsushi Koike
author_sort Tetsuya Matsui
title Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility
title_short Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility
title_full Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility
title_fullStr Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility
title_full_unstemmed Who Is to Blame? The Appearance of Virtual Agents and the Attribution of Perceived Responsibility
title_sort who is to blame? the appearance of virtual agents and the attribution of perceived responsibility
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Virtual agents have been widely used in human-agent collaboration work. One important problem with human-agent collaboration is the attribution of responsibility as perceived by users. We focused on the relationship between the appearance of a virtual agent and the attribution of perceived responsibility. We conducted an experiment with five agents: an agent without an appearance, a human-like agent, a robot-like agent, a dog-like agent, and an angel-like agent. We measured the perceived agency and experience for each agent, and we conducted an experiment involving a sound-guessing game. In the game, participants listened to a sound and guessed what the sound was with an agent. At the end of the game, the game finished with failure, and the participants did not know who made the mistake, the participant or the agent. After the game, we asked the participants how they perceived the agents’ trustworthiness and to whom they attributed responsibility. As a result, participants attributed less responsibility to themselves when interacting with a robot-like agent than interacting with an angel-like robot. Furthermore, participants perceived the least trustworthiness toward the robot-like agent among all conditions. In addition, the agents’ perceived experience had a correlation with the attribution of perceived responsibility. Furthermore, the agents that made the participants feel their attribution of responsibility to be less were not trusted. These results suggest the relationship between agents’ appearance and perceived attribution of responsibility and new methods for designs in the creation of virtual agents for collaboration work.
topic human-agent interaction
virtual agent
attribution of responsibility
human-machine collaboration
trustworthiness
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2646
work_keys_str_mv AT tetsuyamatsui whoistoblametheappearanceofvirtualagentsandtheattributionofperceivedresponsibility
AT atsushikoike whoistoblametheappearanceofvirtualagentsandtheattributionofperceivedresponsibility
_version_ 1721532108191563776