How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge

It is necessary to make decisions by integrating appropriate information that is not used in daily life in disaster prevention before, during, and after disasters. Despite this, it is difficult for people to make use of appropriate information under circumstances where various kinds of information a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teruaki Hayashi, Yukio Ohsawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9054685
id doaj-cfb13a9f1c4a45f6b6191cccb973b080
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfb13a9f1c4a45f6b6191cccb973b0802020-11-25T02:28:10ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction1687-58931687-59072018-01-01201810.1155/2018/90546859054685How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background KnowledgeTeruaki Hayashi0Yukio Ohsawa1Department of Systems Innovation, School of Engineering, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Systems Innovation, School of Engineering, Tokyo, JapanIt is necessary to make decisions by integrating appropriate information that is not used in daily life in disaster prevention before, during, and after disasters. Despite this, it is difficult for people to make use of appropriate information under circumstances where various kinds of information are complicated. People can be in an agitated state in which they do not know what will happen. In this paper, we define this situation as Belief Drift (BD) and discuss what kinds of data should be acquired to understand situations of BD because factors causing BD may be diverse. We collected explanations of BD from researchers with different background knowledge and discussed sets of variables inferred by VARIABLE QUEST (VQ). VQ is the inferring method for variables unifying cooccurrence graphs of variables in the datasets. The results indicate that common variables are externalized from the different explanations of BD by researchers with different background knowledge. Results suggest that, even if the terms used to explain the state of BD differ, the data acquired to understand BD are common.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9054685
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teruaki Hayashi
Yukio Ohsawa
spellingShingle Teruaki Hayashi
Yukio Ohsawa
How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
author_facet Teruaki Hayashi
Yukio Ohsawa
author_sort Teruaki Hayashi
title How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge
title_short How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge
title_full How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge
title_fullStr How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed How to Understand Belief Drift? Externalization of Variables Considering Different Background Knowledge
title_sort how to understand belief drift? externalization of variables considering different background knowledge
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
issn 1687-5893
1687-5907
publishDate 2018-01-01
description It is necessary to make decisions by integrating appropriate information that is not used in daily life in disaster prevention before, during, and after disasters. Despite this, it is difficult for people to make use of appropriate information under circumstances where various kinds of information are complicated. People can be in an agitated state in which they do not know what will happen. In this paper, we define this situation as Belief Drift (BD) and discuss what kinds of data should be acquired to understand situations of BD because factors causing BD may be diverse. We collected explanations of BD from researchers with different background knowledge and discussed sets of variables inferred by VARIABLE QUEST (VQ). VQ is the inferring method for variables unifying cooccurrence graphs of variables in the datasets. The results indicate that common variables are externalized from the different explanations of BD by researchers with different background knowledge. Results suggest that, even if the terms used to explain the state of BD differ, the data acquired to understand BD are common.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9054685
work_keys_str_mv AT teruakihayashi howtounderstandbeliefdriftexternalizationofvariablesconsideringdifferentbackgroundknowledge
AT yukioohsawa howtounderstandbeliefdriftexternalizationofvariablesconsideringdifferentbackgroundknowledge
_version_ 1724839851811930112