Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale

Introduction: The Marijuana Problems Scale (MPS) is a widely-used self-report measure of cannabis-related negative consequences that has a past three-month reporting window. This report describes the psychometric characteristics of a lifetime version (MPS-L). Methods: As part of a larger study, 119...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David C. Hodgins, Jonathan N. Stea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-12-01
Series:Addictive Behaviors Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218300129
id doaj-cfa6d7f4221f483099e986d62bc291d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfa6d7f4221f483099e986d62bc291d42020-11-24T22:32:15ZengElsevierAddictive Behaviors Reports2352-85322018-12-0182124Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scaleDavid C. Hodgins0Jonathan N. Stea1Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.; University of Calgary, CanadaUniversity of Calgary, CanadaIntroduction: The Marijuana Problems Scale (MPS) is a widely-used self-report measure of cannabis-related negative consequences that has a past three-month reporting window. This report describes the psychometric characteristics of a lifetime version (MPS-L). Methods: As part of a larger study, 119 individuals who had recovered from cannabis use disorder completed the MPS-L on two occasions 2 weeks apart and 91 participant-nominated family and friends also completed a collateral version of the scale. Results: Item analyses and principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that three of the 19 items were relatively weaker. Omitting these items, the MPS-L showed good internal reliability (α = 0.88, for summed severity total, α = 0.85 for number of consequences identified) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.81 and 0.73). As expected, correlations with collateral reports were moderate (r = 0.33 and 0.29), and collaterals reported significantly fewer negative consequences than participants. MPS total scores also correlated as expected with external validity measures (e.g., number of cannabis use disorder symptoms reported, motives for use, lifetime depression, treatment history). PCA supported the use of a total score summed score, but also revealed two secondary factors, measuring internal consequences (e.g., low self-esteem) and external consequences (e.g., financial difficulties). Conclusions: These analyses provide good preliminary support for a lifetime version of the MPS, with the summed severity total score performing slightly better than the total number of consequences endorsed. Keywords: Marijuana problems scale, Cannabis problems, Marijuana, Psychometricshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218300129
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David C. Hodgins
Jonathan N. Stea
spellingShingle David C. Hodgins
Jonathan N. Stea
Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
Addictive Behaviors Reports
author_facet David C. Hodgins
Jonathan N. Stea
author_sort David C. Hodgins
title Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
title_short Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
title_full Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
title_fullStr Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
title_sort psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale
publisher Elsevier
series Addictive Behaviors Reports
issn 2352-8532
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Introduction: The Marijuana Problems Scale (MPS) is a widely-used self-report measure of cannabis-related negative consequences that has a past three-month reporting window. This report describes the psychometric characteristics of a lifetime version (MPS-L). Methods: As part of a larger study, 119 individuals who had recovered from cannabis use disorder completed the MPS-L on two occasions 2 weeks apart and 91 participant-nominated family and friends also completed a collateral version of the scale. Results: Item analyses and principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that three of the 19 items were relatively weaker. Omitting these items, the MPS-L showed good internal reliability (α = 0.88, for summed severity total, α = 0.85 for number of consequences identified) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.81 and 0.73). As expected, correlations with collateral reports were moderate (r = 0.33 and 0.29), and collaterals reported significantly fewer negative consequences than participants. MPS total scores also correlated as expected with external validity measures (e.g., number of cannabis use disorder symptoms reported, motives for use, lifetime depression, treatment history). PCA supported the use of a total score summed score, but also revealed two secondary factors, measuring internal consequences (e.g., low self-esteem) and external consequences (e.g., financial difficulties). Conclusions: These analyses provide good preliminary support for a lifetime version of the MPS, with the summed severity total score performing slightly better than the total number of consequences endorsed. Keywords: Marijuana problems scale, Cannabis problems, Marijuana, Psychometrics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218300129
work_keys_str_mv AT davidchodgins psychometricevaluationofalifetimeversionofthemarijuanaproblemsscale
AT jonathannstea psychometricevaluationofalifetimeversionofthemarijuanaproblemsscale
_version_ 1725734348758450176