A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?

Wendy Clyne,1 Sarah McLachlan2 1Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, UK; 2Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK Objectives: We describe a key informant study that invited national medicines policy leads for the European...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clyne W, McLachlan S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-10-01
Series:Patient Preference and Adherence
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/a-mixed-methods-study-of-the-implementation-ofnbspmedication-adherence-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
id doaj-cfa026c5f4f54e3798b6c14d28064ad2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfa026c5f4f54e3798b6c14d28064ad22020-11-24T22:58:19ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2015-10-012015default1505151524325A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?Clyne WMcLachlan SWendy Clyne,1 Sarah McLachlan2 1Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, UK; 2Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK Objectives: We describe a key informant study that invited national medicines policy leads for the European Union member states to self-assess the level of implementation of medicines adherence initiatives in their country and the adequacy of that implementation. Interviews with medicines policy leads enabled in-depth understanding of the variation in adherence support across nations and the ways in which different nations prioritize, plan, and implement medicines adherence systems and services.Methods: Ten national policy leads (Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, and the Netherlands) completed a self-assessment survey, and seven (Estonia, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, Malta, and the Netherlands) engaged in a follow-up interview.Key findings: Policy leads varied in the level of implementation of medication adherence solutions that they reported in their nations; most initiatives were aimed directly at patients with few initiatives at government or health care commissioner levels of action. Policy leads reported insufficient implementation of medication adherence initiatives across all potential domains. Barriers to implementation included lack of resources, strategic planning, evidence to support action, the “hidden” nature of medication adherence within policy work, and dispersed responsibility for medication adherence as a policy and practice theme.Conclusion: This study has international significance and summarizes the emergent characteristics of nations with and without coordinated medication adherence activity. We highlight the importance of sharing good practice in policy formulation and implementation for medication adherence. Keywords: medication adherence, policy implementation, medicines policy, health care policyhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-mixed-methods-study-of-the-implementation-ofnbspmedication-adherence-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clyne W
McLachlan S
spellingShingle Clyne W
McLachlan S
A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?
Patient Preference and Adherence
author_facet Clyne W
McLachlan S
author_sort Clyne W
title A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?
title_short A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?
title_full A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?
title_fullStr A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?
title_full_unstemmed A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?
title_sort mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do european countries compare?
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Patient Preference and Adherence
issn 1177-889X
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Wendy Clyne,1 Sarah McLachlan2 1Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, UK; 2Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK Objectives: We describe a key informant study that invited national medicines policy leads for the European Union member states to self-assess the level of implementation of medicines adherence initiatives in their country and the adequacy of that implementation. Interviews with medicines policy leads enabled in-depth understanding of the variation in adherence support across nations and the ways in which different nations prioritize, plan, and implement medicines adherence systems and services.Methods: Ten national policy leads (Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, and the Netherlands) completed a self-assessment survey, and seven (Estonia, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, Malta, and the Netherlands) engaged in a follow-up interview.Key findings: Policy leads varied in the level of implementation of medication adherence solutions that they reported in their nations; most initiatives were aimed directly at patients with few initiatives at government or health care commissioner levels of action. Policy leads reported insufficient implementation of medication adherence initiatives across all potential domains. Barriers to implementation included lack of resources, strategic planning, evidence to support action, the “hidden” nature of medication adherence within policy work, and dispersed responsibility for medication adherence as a policy and practice theme.Conclusion: This study has international significance and summarizes the emergent characteristics of nations with and without coordinated medication adherence activity. We highlight the importance of sharing good practice in policy formulation and implementation for medication adherence. Keywords: medication adherence, policy implementation, medicines policy, health care policy
url https://www.dovepress.com/a-mixed-methods-study-of-the-implementation-ofnbspmedication-adherence-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
work_keys_str_mv AT clynew amixedmethodsstudyoftheimplementationofnbspmedicationadherencepolicysolutionshowdoeuropeancountriescompare
AT mclachlans amixedmethodsstudyoftheimplementationofnbspmedicationadherencepolicysolutionshowdoeuropeancountriescompare
AT clynew mixedmethodsstudyoftheimplementationofnbspmedicationadherencepolicysolutionshowdoeuropeancountriescompare
AT mclachlans mixedmethodsstudyoftheimplementationofnbspmedicationadherencepolicysolutionshowdoeuropeancountriescompare
_version_ 1725647521371389952