Soil health management practices and crop productivity

Abstract Globally, food systems face multiple challenges, including minimizing environmental impacts, adapting to a changing climate, increasing yields, and maintaining and/or increasing crop nutritional quality. Management techniques that focus on soil health (SH) are promising solutions to mitigat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grace L. Miner, Jorge A. Delgado, James A. Ippolito, Catherine E. Stewart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20023
id doaj-cf90022b780e43e0be9b3ea2dd876efa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf90022b780e43e0be9b3ea2dd876efa2021-02-05T06:02:44ZengWileyAgricultural & Environmental Letters2471-96252020-01-0151n/an/a10.1002/ael2.20023Soil health management practices and crop productivityGrace L. Miner0Jorge A. Delgado1James A. Ippolito2Catherine E. Stewart3Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins CO 80523 USAUSDA Agricultural Research Service Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research 2150 Centre Ave. Fort Collins CO 80526 USADep. of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins CO 80523 USAUSDA Agricultural Research Service Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research 2150 Centre Ave. Fort Collins CO 80526 USAAbstract Globally, food systems face multiple challenges, including minimizing environmental impacts, adapting to a changing climate, increasing yields, and maintaining and/or increasing crop nutritional quality. Management techniques that focus on soil health (SH) are promising solutions to mitigate some environmental impacts and may increase economic returns. However, claims that SH increases will concurrently increase crop quality and productivity merit careful examination. Factors beyond SH metrics determine crop nutritional quality. Yield outcomes of SH management are of significance, as there are concerns that yield increases are insufficient to meet future food demands. While SH frameworks are comparatively recent initiatives, there are thousands of published conservation agriculture studies that examine yield outcomes with cover crops, no‐till, and rotation. This literature indicates that SH practices can also have neutral or negative yield impacts—only in select systems have consistent yield increases been realized, highlighting the need for language clarification and improvements in mechanistic understanding of regional‐scale yield impacts.https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20023
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grace L. Miner
Jorge A. Delgado
James A. Ippolito
Catherine E. Stewart
spellingShingle Grace L. Miner
Jorge A. Delgado
James A. Ippolito
Catherine E. Stewart
Soil health management practices and crop productivity
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
author_facet Grace L. Miner
Jorge A. Delgado
James A. Ippolito
Catherine E. Stewart
author_sort Grace L. Miner
title Soil health management practices and crop productivity
title_short Soil health management practices and crop productivity
title_full Soil health management practices and crop productivity
title_fullStr Soil health management practices and crop productivity
title_full_unstemmed Soil health management practices and crop productivity
title_sort soil health management practices and crop productivity
publisher Wiley
series Agricultural & Environmental Letters
issn 2471-9625
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Globally, food systems face multiple challenges, including minimizing environmental impacts, adapting to a changing climate, increasing yields, and maintaining and/or increasing crop nutritional quality. Management techniques that focus on soil health (SH) are promising solutions to mitigate some environmental impacts and may increase economic returns. However, claims that SH increases will concurrently increase crop quality and productivity merit careful examination. Factors beyond SH metrics determine crop nutritional quality. Yield outcomes of SH management are of significance, as there are concerns that yield increases are insufficient to meet future food demands. While SH frameworks are comparatively recent initiatives, there are thousands of published conservation agriculture studies that examine yield outcomes with cover crops, no‐till, and rotation. This literature indicates that SH practices can also have neutral or negative yield impacts—only in select systems have consistent yield increases been realized, highlighting the need for language clarification and improvements in mechanistic understanding of regional‐scale yield impacts.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20023
work_keys_str_mv AT gracelminer soilhealthmanagementpracticesandcropproductivity
AT jorgeadelgado soilhealthmanagementpracticesandcropproductivity
AT jamesaippolito soilhealthmanagementpracticesandcropproductivity
AT catherineestewart soilhealthmanagementpracticesandcropproductivity
_version_ 1724284172808224768