Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process

Banking financial performance (BFP) has been recognized as a causation of human resource management (HRM). The causal linkages from HRM practices to BFP are different. Nevertheless, almost none of the studies has ranked and compared this difference among the practices of HRM in enhancing BFP. The cu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quang Linh Huynh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Growing Science 2020-09-01
Series:Accounting
Online Access:http://www.growingscience.com/ac/Vol6/ac_2020_115.pdf
id doaj-cf72857810274cf09dad59040dd1b073
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf72857810274cf09dad59040dd1b0732020-11-25T03:40:07ZengGrowing ScienceAccounting2369-73932369-74072020-09-016710.5267/j.ac.2020.8.018Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process Quang Linh HuynhBanking financial performance (BFP) has been recognized as a causation of human resource management (HRM). The causal linkages from HRM practices to BFP are different. Nevertheless, almost none of the studies has ranked and compared this difference among the practices of HRM in enhancing BFP. The current study applied an analytic hierarchy process to rank the relative importance of HRM practices. For the robustness of the results from the process of analytic hierarchy, the current work employed an analytic hierarchy process to reassess the relatively important levels of HRM practices on BFP as well. The findings are robust across both of the techniques. The practice of training and development (TT) plays the most critical part in BFP, followed by the practice of performance evaluation (PN) and the practice of reward system (RM) as the third most important. In contrast, the practice of recruitment and selection (RN) takes the least important position in BFP. Moreover, the findings also provide statistical evidence on the causal links from the practices of HRM to BFP. This work makes some contribution to how managers should decide on HRM practices in order to obtain the best possible BFP. http://www.growingscience.com/ac/Vol6/ac_2020_115.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Quang Linh Huynh
spellingShingle Quang Linh Huynh
Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
Accounting
author_facet Quang Linh Huynh
author_sort Quang Linh Huynh
title Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
title_short Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
title_full Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
title_fullStr Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
title_full_unstemmed Comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
title_sort comparative significance of human resource management practices on banking financial performance with analytic hierarchy process
publisher Growing Science
series Accounting
issn 2369-7393
2369-7407
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Banking financial performance (BFP) has been recognized as a causation of human resource management (HRM). The causal linkages from HRM practices to BFP are different. Nevertheless, almost none of the studies has ranked and compared this difference among the practices of HRM in enhancing BFP. The current study applied an analytic hierarchy process to rank the relative importance of HRM practices. For the robustness of the results from the process of analytic hierarchy, the current work employed an analytic hierarchy process to reassess the relatively important levels of HRM practices on BFP as well. The findings are robust across both of the techniques. The practice of training and development (TT) plays the most critical part in BFP, followed by the practice of performance evaluation (PN) and the practice of reward system (RM) as the third most important. In contrast, the practice of recruitment and selection (RN) takes the least important position in BFP. Moreover, the findings also provide statistical evidence on the causal links from the practices of HRM to BFP. This work makes some contribution to how managers should decide on HRM practices in order to obtain the best possible BFP.
url http://www.growingscience.com/ac/Vol6/ac_2020_115.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT quanglinhhuynh comparativesignificanceofhumanresourcemanagementpracticesonbankingfinancialperformancewithanalytichierarchyprocess
_version_ 1724536234639884288