Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer management has improved dramatically in the past three decades and as a result, a population of working age women is breast cancer survivor. Interventions for breast cancer survivors have shown improvements in quality o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frings-Dresen MHW, Broekhuizen MLA, Hoving JL
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-04-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/117
id doaj-cf4b8caef3f0469aa6f6f0c52b83b37a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf4b8caef3f0469aa6f6f0c52b83b37a2020-11-24T21:58:24ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072009-04-019111710.1186/1471-2407-9-117Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studiesFrings-Dresen MHWBroekhuizen MLAHoving JL<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer management has improved dramatically in the past three decades and as a result, a population of working age women is breast cancer survivor. Interventions for breast cancer survivors have shown improvements in quality of life and in physical and psychological states. In contrast, efforts aimed at stimulating re-employment and return-to-work interventions for breast cancer survivors have not kept pace. The objective of this review was to study the effects and characteristics of intervention studies on breast cancer survivors in which the outcome was return to work.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006), Medline, Ovid, EMBASE and PsychInfo were systematically searched for studies conducted between 1970 to February 2007. Intervention studies for female breast cancer survivors that were focused on return to work were included.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our search strategy identified 5219 studies. Four studies out of 100 potentially relevant abstracts were selected and included 46–317 employed women who had had mastectomy, adjuvant therapy and rehabilitation, with the outcome return to work. The intervention programs focused on improvement of physical, psychological and social recovery. Although a substantial percentage (between 75% to 85%) of patients included in these studies returned to work after rehabilitation, it is not clear whether this proportion would have been lower for patients without counseling or exercise, or any other interventions, as three out of four studies did not include a comparison group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The most important finding of this review is the lack of methodologically sound intervention studies on breast cancer survivors with the outcome return to work. Using evidence from qualitative and observational studies on cancer and the good results of intervention studies on return to work programs and vocational rehabilitation, return to work interventions for breast cancer survivors should be further developed and evaluated.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/117
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frings-Dresen MHW
Broekhuizen MLA
Hoving JL
spellingShingle Frings-Dresen MHW
Broekhuizen MLA
Hoving JL
Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
BMC Cancer
author_facet Frings-Dresen MHW
Broekhuizen MLA
Hoving JL
author_sort Frings-Dresen MHW
title Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
title_short Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
title_full Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
title_fullStr Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
title_full_unstemmed Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
title_sort return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2009-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer management has improved dramatically in the past three decades and as a result, a population of working age women is breast cancer survivor. Interventions for breast cancer survivors have shown improvements in quality of life and in physical and psychological states. In contrast, efforts aimed at stimulating re-employment and return-to-work interventions for breast cancer survivors have not kept pace. The objective of this review was to study the effects and characteristics of intervention studies on breast cancer survivors in which the outcome was return to work.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006), Medline, Ovid, EMBASE and PsychInfo were systematically searched for studies conducted between 1970 to February 2007. Intervention studies for female breast cancer survivors that were focused on return to work were included.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our search strategy identified 5219 studies. Four studies out of 100 potentially relevant abstracts were selected and included 46–317 employed women who had had mastectomy, adjuvant therapy and rehabilitation, with the outcome return to work. The intervention programs focused on improvement of physical, psychological and social recovery. Although a substantial percentage (between 75% to 85%) of patients included in these studies returned to work after rehabilitation, it is not clear whether this proportion would have been lower for patients without counseling or exercise, or any other interventions, as three out of four studies did not include a comparison group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The most important finding of this review is the lack of methodologically sound intervention studies on breast cancer survivors with the outcome return to work. Using evidence from qualitative and observational studies on cancer and the good results of intervention studies on return to work programs and vocational rehabilitation, return to work interventions for breast cancer survivors should be further developed and evaluated.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/117
work_keys_str_mv AT fringsdresenmhw returntoworkofbreastcancersurvivorsasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT broekhuizenmla returntoworkofbreastcancersurvivorsasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT hovingjl returntoworkofbreastcancersurvivorsasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
_version_ 1725852123312160768