Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload

The passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) framework has been shown to be a very promising construct for assessing cognitive and affective state in both individuals and teams. There is a growing body of work that focuses on solving the challenges of transitioning pBCI systems from the research labo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Ronald Estepp, James Christopher Christensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2015.00054/full
id doaj-cf25e4b9bdca4226accfcedc6093a50f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf25e4b9bdca4226accfcedc6093a50f2020-11-24T22:44:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2015-03-01910.3389/fnins.2015.0005487526Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workloadJustin Ronald Estepp0James Christopher Christensen1Air Force Research LaboratoryAir Force Research LaboratoryThe passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) framework has been shown to be a very promising construct for assessing cognitive and affective state in both individuals and teams. There is a growing body of work that focuses on solving the challenges of transitioning pBCI systems from the research laboratory environment to practical, everyday use. An interesting issue is what impact methodological variability may have on the ability to reliably identify (neuro)physiological patterns that are useful for state assessment. This work aimed at quantifying the effects of methodological variability in a pBCI design for detecting changes in cognitive workload. Specific focus was directed toward the effects of replacing electrodes over dual sessions (thus inducing changes in placement, electromechanical properties, and/or impedance between the electrode and skin surface) on the accuracy of several machine learning approaches in a binary classification problem. In investigating these methodological variables, it was determined that the removal and replacement of the electrode suite between sessions does not impact the accuracy of a number of learning approaches when trained on one session and tested on a second. This finding was confirmed by comparing to a control group for which the electrode suite was not replaced between sessions. This result suggests that sensors (both neurological and peripheral) may be removed and replaced over the course of many interactions with a pBCI system without affecting its performance. Future work on multi-session and multi-day pBCI system use should seek to replicate this (lack of) effect between sessions in other tasks, temporal time courses, and data analytic approaches while also focusing on non-stationarity and variable classification performance due to intrinsic factors.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2015.00054/fullmachine learningElectroencephalography (EEG)cognitive workloadPassive Brain-Computer Interfacecognitive state
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin Ronald Estepp
James Christopher Christensen
spellingShingle Justin Ronald Estepp
James Christopher Christensen
Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
Frontiers in Neuroscience
machine learning
Electroencephalography (EEG)
cognitive workload
Passive Brain-Computer Interface
cognitive state
author_facet Justin Ronald Estepp
James Christopher Christensen
author_sort Justin Ronald Estepp
title Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
title_short Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
title_full Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
title_fullStr Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
title_full_unstemmed Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
title_sort electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2015-03-01
description The passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) framework has been shown to be a very promising construct for assessing cognitive and affective state in both individuals and teams. There is a growing body of work that focuses on solving the challenges of transitioning pBCI systems from the research laboratory environment to practical, everyday use. An interesting issue is what impact methodological variability may have on the ability to reliably identify (neuro)physiological patterns that are useful for state assessment. This work aimed at quantifying the effects of methodological variability in a pBCI design for detecting changes in cognitive workload. Specific focus was directed toward the effects of replacing electrodes over dual sessions (thus inducing changes in placement, electromechanical properties, and/or impedance between the electrode and skin surface) on the accuracy of several machine learning approaches in a binary classification problem. In investigating these methodological variables, it was determined that the removal and replacement of the electrode suite between sessions does not impact the accuracy of a number of learning approaches when trained on one session and tested on a second. This finding was confirmed by comparing to a control group for which the electrode suite was not replaced between sessions. This result suggests that sensors (both neurological and peripheral) may be removed and replaced over the course of many interactions with a pBCI system without affecting its performance. Future work on multi-session and multi-day pBCI system use should seek to replicate this (lack of) effect between sessions in other tasks, temporal time courses, and data analytic approaches while also focusing on non-stationarity and variable classification performance due to intrinsic factors.
topic machine learning
Electroencephalography (EEG)
cognitive workload
Passive Brain-Computer Interface
cognitive state
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2015.00054/full
work_keys_str_mv AT justinronaldestepp electrodereplacementdoesnotaffectclassificationaccuracyindualsessionuseofapassivebraincomputerinterfaceforassessingcognitiveworkload
AT jameschristopherchristensen electrodereplacementdoesnotaffectclassificationaccuracyindualsessionuseofapassivebraincomputerinterfaceforassessingcognitiveworkload
_version_ 1725693064264024064