Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat

Background: Considering the common origin of skin and peripheral nervous system, a tube of dermal layer of skin hypothetically can be an ideal conduit for nerve reconstruction. An experimental study performed to evaluate the nerve regeneration of efficacy into a dermal tube. Methods: Sixty male Wist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Javad Fatemi, Kamal Seyed Foroutan, Abass Kazemi Ashtiani, Maryam Jafari Mansoori, Reza Vaghardoost, Sepehr Pedram, Aidin Hosseinpolli, Fatemeh Rajabi, Seyed Jaber Mousavi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2010;volume=15;issue=4;spage=208;epage=213;aulast=Fatemi
id doaj-cf2546cea43e467b9dee8cf6654662e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf2546cea43e467b9dee8cf6654662e02020-11-25T00:34:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362010-01-01154208213Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in ratMohammad Javad FatemiKamal Seyed ForoutanAbass Kazemi AshtianiMaryam Jafari MansooriReza VaghardoostSepehr PedramAidin HosseinpolliFatemeh RajabiSeyed Jaber MousaviBackground: Considering the common origin of skin and peripheral nervous system, a tube of dermal layer of skin hypothetically can be an ideal conduit for nerve reconstruction. An experimental study performed to evaluate the nerve regeneration of efficacy into a dermal tube. Methods: Sixty male Wistar rats were used. A 10 mm gap was produced in right sciatic nerves. In group A the autogenous nerve grafts were used to bridge the defects. In group B vein conduit were use to reconstruct the gaps. In group C dermal tube were used to bridge the defects. Morphologic studies were carried out after 3 month. Results: The density of nerve fibers was significantly higher in autogenous nerve graft group. The efficacy of nerve growth into the dermal tube group was significantly poor in comparison to other groups. Conclusions: In the present study, dermis was used as the nerve conduit for the first time. This study indicates that the dermal tube is not a suitable conduit for nerve regeneration till further studies to resolve the problems before clinical application.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2010;volume=15;issue=4;spage=208;epage=213;aulast=FatemiNerve InjuryNerve GapNerve ConduitDermal TubeAutogenous Nerve Graft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Javad Fatemi
Kamal Seyed Foroutan
Abass Kazemi Ashtiani
Maryam Jafari Mansoori
Reza Vaghardoost
Sepehr Pedram
Aidin Hosseinpolli
Fatemeh Rajabi
Seyed Jaber Mousavi
spellingShingle Mohammad Javad Fatemi
Kamal Seyed Foroutan
Abass Kazemi Ashtiani
Maryam Jafari Mansoori
Reza Vaghardoost
Sepehr Pedram
Aidin Hosseinpolli
Fatemeh Rajabi
Seyed Jaber Mousavi
Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Nerve Injury
Nerve Gap
Nerve Conduit
Dermal Tube
Autogenous Nerve Graft
author_facet Mohammad Javad Fatemi
Kamal Seyed Foroutan
Abass Kazemi Ashtiani
Maryam Jafari Mansoori
Reza Vaghardoost
Sepehr Pedram
Aidin Hosseinpolli
Fatemeh Rajabi
Seyed Jaber Mousavi
author_sort Mohammad Javad Fatemi
title Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
title_short Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
title_full Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
title_fullStr Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
title_sort comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Background: Considering the common origin of skin and peripheral nervous system, a tube of dermal layer of skin hypothetically can be an ideal conduit for nerve reconstruction. An experimental study performed to evaluate the nerve regeneration of efficacy into a dermal tube. Methods: Sixty male Wistar rats were used. A 10 mm gap was produced in right sciatic nerves. In group A the autogenous nerve grafts were used to bridge the defects. In group B vein conduit were use to reconstruct the gaps. In group C dermal tube were used to bridge the defects. Morphologic studies were carried out after 3 month. Results: The density of nerve fibers was significantly higher in autogenous nerve graft group. The efficacy of nerve growth into the dermal tube group was significantly poor in comparison to other groups. Conclusions: In the present study, dermis was used as the nerve conduit for the first time. This study indicates that the dermal tube is not a suitable conduit for nerve regeneration till further studies to resolve the problems before clinical application.
topic Nerve Injury
Nerve Gap
Nerve Conduit
Dermal Tube
Autogenous Nerve Graft
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2010;volume=15;issue=4;spage=208;epage=213;aulast=Fatemi
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadjavadfatemi comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT kamalseyedforoutan comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT abasskazemiashtiani comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT maryamjafarimansoori comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT rezavaghardoost comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT sepehrpedram comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT aidinhosseinpolli comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT fatemehrajabi comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
AT seyedjabermousavi comparisonofdividedsciaticnervegrowthwithindermisvenousandnervegraftconduitinrat
_version_ 1725312966728876032