Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the bond strength of universal cements cured either dually or chemically only. Methods: Three cements were assessed using different types of application: dual activated (DA) or chemically activated (CA). In total 80 dentin blocks were used, obtai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eliane de Lima, Ricardo Santos, Márcia Durão, Armiliana Nascimento, Rodivan Braz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314
id doaj-cf1fa0db25654f8cb1d18c6fd56ab7de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf1fa0db25654f8cb1d18c6fd56ab7de2021-04-02T12:36:52ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica2333-79312016-12-012112512910.1080/23337931.2016.12213141221314Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activatedEliane de Lima0Ricardo Santos1Márcia Durão2Armiliana Nascimento3Rodivan Braz4University of PernambucoUniversity of PernambucoUniversity of PernambucoUniversity of PernambucoUniversity of PernambucoObjective: The aim of the present study was to assess the bond strength of universal cements cured either dually or chemically only. Methods: Three cements were assessed using different types of application: dual activated (DA) or chemically activated (CA). In total 80 dentin blocks were used, obtained through the enamel wear of the lingual and buccal surfaces of bovine incisors. Standard cone-shaped cavity preparations were created using diamond burs. Subsequently, indirect restoration blocks were designed with Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) composite resin. The teeth were divided into two groups (DA and CA) and then subdivided into four subgroups (n = 10) prior to cementation with the respective products: Duo-Link (Bisco); RelyX Ultimate (3M ESPE); Nexus 3 (Kerr) and conventional RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) as the control. The cementation in the PA group was applied following the manufacturer’s instructions. The CA group was cemented in a darkroom to avoid exposure to light. They were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and submitted to the push-out test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < .05). Results: The greatest bond strength results were obtained for photoactivated universal cements. Conclusion: Chemical activation is not sufficient to ensure acceptable bond strength.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314Dentinresin cementbond strength
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eliane de Lima
Ricardo Santos
Márcia Durão
Armiliana Nascimento
Rodivan Braz
spellingShingle Eliane de Lima
Ricardo Santos
Márcia Durão
Armiliana Nascimento
Rodivan Braz
Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica
Dentin
resin cement
bond strength
author_facet Eliane de Lima
Ricardo Santos
Márcia Durão
Armiliana Nascimento
Rodivan Braz
author_sort Eliane de Lima
title Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
title_short Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
title_full Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
title_fullStr Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
title_full_unstemmed Universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
title_sort universal cements: dual activated and chemically activated
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica
issn 2333-7931
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the bond strength of universal cements cured either dually or chemically only. Methods: Three cements were assessed using different types of application: dual activated (DA) or chemically activated (CA). In total 80 dentin blocks were used, obtained through the enamel wear of the lingual and buccal surfaces of bovine incisors. Standard cone-shaped cavity preparations were created using diamond burs. Subsequently, indirect restoration blocks were designed with Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) composite resin. The teeth were divided into two groups (DA and CA) and then subdivided into four subgroups (n = 10) prior to cementation with the respective products: Duo-Link (Bisco); RelyX Ultimate (3M ESPE); Nexus 3 (Kerr) and conventional RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) as the control. The cementation in the PA group was applied following the manufacturer’s instructions. The CA group was cemented in a darkroom to avoid exposure to light. They were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and submitted to the push-out test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < .05). Results: The greatest bond strength results were obtained for photoactivated universal cements. Conclusion: Chemical activation is not sufficient to ensure acceptable bond strength.
topic Dentin
resin cement
bond strength
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1221314
work_keys_str_mv AT elianedelima universalcementsdualactivatedandchemicallyactivated
AT ricardosantos universalcementsdualactivatedandchemicallyactivated
AT marciadurao universalcementsdualactivatedandchemicallyactivated
AT armiliananascimento universalcementsdualactivatedandchemicallyactivated
AT rodivanbraz universalcementsdualactivatedandchemicallyactivated
_version_ 1721568407532339200