Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs

Abstract Background Differentiating benign from canine malignant mammary tumors requires invasive surgical biopsy. Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) may represent promising minimally invasive cancer biomarkers in people and animals. Objectives To evaluate the serum mRNA profile between dogs with and wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric J. Fish, Esther Gisela Martinez‐Romero, Patricia DeInnocentes, Jey W. Koehler, Nripesh Prasad, Annette N. Smith, Richard Curt Bird
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15764
id doaj-cf10aec3449f4f05b23baf06fc811e60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf10aec3449f4f05b23baf06fc811e602020-11-25T02:48:38ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762020-05-013431282129010.1111/jvim.15764Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogsEric J. Fish0Esther Gisela Martinez‐Romero1Patricia DeInnocentes2Jey W. Koehler3Nripesh Prasad4Annette N. Smith5Richard Curt Bird6Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, AURIC—Auburn University Research Initiative in Cancer Auburn University Auburn Alabama United StatesDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, AURIC—Auburn University Research Initiative in Cancer Auburn University Auburn Alabama United StatesDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, AURIC—Auburn University Research Initiative in Cancer Auburn University Auburn Alabama United StatesDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, AURIC—Auburn University Research Initiative in Cancer Auburn University Auburn Alabama United StatesGenomic Services Laboratory Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology Huntsville Alabama United StatesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine Auburn University Auburn Alabama United StatesDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, AURIC—Auburn University Research Initiative in Cancer Auburn University Auburn Alabama United StatesAbstract Background Differentiating benign from canine malignant mammary tumors requires invasive surgical biopsy. Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) may represent promising minimally invasive cancer biomarkers in people and animals. Objectives To evaluate the serum mRNA profile between dogs with and without mammary carcinoma, and to determine if any of these markers have prognostic significance. Animals Ten healthy client‐owned female dogs (5 intact, 5 spayed) and 10 dogs with histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma were included; 9 were client‐owned, whereas 1 was a research colony dog. Methods Retrospective study. Serum miRNA was evaluated by RNA deep‐sequencing (RNAseq) and digital droplet PCR (dPCR).Expression of candidate biomarkers miR‐18a, miR‐19b, miR‐29b, miR‐34c, miR‐122, miR‐125a, and miR‐181a was compared with clinical characteristics, including grade, metastasis, and survival. Results 452 unique serum miRNAs were detected by RNAseq. Sixty‐five individual miRNAs were differentially expressed (>±1.5‐fold) and statistically significant between groups. Serum miR‐19b (P = .003) and miR‐125a (P < .001) were significantly higher in the mammary carcinoma group by dPCR. Both had high accuracy based on receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (0.930 for miR‐125a; 0.880 for miR‐19b). Circulating miR‐18a by RNAseq was significantly higher in mammary carcinoma dogs with histologic evidence of lymphatic invasion (P = 0.03). There was no significant association with any miRNA and survival or inflammatory status. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Circulating miRNAs are differentially expressed in dogs with mammary carcinoma. Serum miR‐19b and miR‐18a represent candidate biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15764caninemicroRNAserum biomarkersmammary carcinoma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric J. Fish
Esther Gisela Martinez‐Romero
Patricia DeInnocentes
Jey W. Koehler
Nripesh Prasad
Annette N. Smith
Richard Curt Bird
spellingShingle Eric J. Fish
Esther Gisela Martinez‐Romero
Patricia DeInnocentes
Jey W. Koehler
Nripesh Prasad
Annette N. Smith
Richard Curt Bird
Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
canine
microRNA
serum biomarkers
mammary carcinoma
author_facet Eric J. Fish
Esther Gisela Martinez‐Romero
Patricia DeInnocentes
Jey W. Koehler
Nripesh Prasad
Annette N. Smith
Richard Curt Bird
author_sort Eric J. Fish
title Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
title_short Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
title_full Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
title_fullStr Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Circulating microRNA as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
title_sort circulating microrna as biomarkers of canine mammary carcinoma in dogs
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background Differentiating benign from canine malignant mammary tumors requires invasive surgical biopsy. Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) may represent promising minimally invasive cancer biomarkers in people and animals. Objectives To evaluate the serum mRNA profile between dogs with and without mammary carcinoma, and to determine if any of these markers have prognostic significance. Animals Ten healthy client‐owned female dogs (5 intact, 5 spayed) and 10 dogs with histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma were included; 9 were client‐owned, whereas 1 was a research colony dog. Methods Retrospective study. Serum miRNA was evaluated by RNA deep‐sequencing (RNAseq) and digital droplet PCR (dPCR).Expression of candidate biomarkers miR‐18a, miR‐19b, miR‐29b, miR‐34c, miR‐122, miR‐125a, and miR‐181a was compared with clinical characteristics, including grade, metastasis, and survival. Results 452 unique serum miRNAs were detected by RNAseq. Sixty‐five individual miRNAs were differentially expressed (>±1.5‐fold) and statistically significant between groups. Serum miR‐19b (P = .003) and miR‐125a (P < .001) were significantly higher in the mammary carcinoma group by dPCR. Both had high accuracy based on receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (0.930 for miR‐125a; 0.880 for miR‐19b). Circulating miR‐18a by RNAseq was significantly higher in mammary carcinoma dogs with histologic evidence of lymphatic invasion (P = 0.03). There was no significant association with any miRNA and survival or inflammatory status. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Circulating miRNAs are differentially expressed in dogs with mammary carcinoma. Serum miR‐19b and miR‐18a represent candidate biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, respectively.
topic canine
microRNA
serum biomarkers
mammary carcinoma
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15764
work_keys_str_mv AT ericjfish circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
AT esthergiselamartinezromero circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
AT patriciadeinnocentes circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
AT jeywkoehler circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
AT nripeshprasad circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
AT annettensmith circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
AT richardcurtbird circulatingmicrornaasbiomarkersofcaninemammarycarcinomaindogs
_version_ 1724747350888415232