Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size

Insect brains are known to express a high degree of experience-dependent structural plasticity. One brain structure in particular, the mushroom body (MB), has been attended to in numerous studies as it is implicated in complex cognitive processes such as olfactory learning and memory. It is, however...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maertha Eriksson, Sören Nylin, Mikael A. Carlsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2019-08-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190875
id doaj-cf08cee56b914e13a0c3a81b9a7e8327
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf08cee56b914e13a0c3a81b9a7e83272020-11-25T04:02:57ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032019-08-016810.1098/rsos.190875190875Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil sizeMaertha ErikssonSören NylinMikael A. CarlssonInsect brains are known to express a high degree of experience-dependent structural plasticity. One brain structure in particular, the mushroom body (MB), has been attended to in numerous studies as it is implicated in complex cognitive processes such as olfactory learning and memory. It is, however, poorly understood to what extent sensory input per se affects the plasticity of the mushroom bodies. By performing unilateral blocking of olfactory input on immobilized butterflies, we were able to measure the effect of passive sensory input on the volumes of antennal lobes (ALs) and MB calyces. We showed that the primary and secondary olfactory neuropils respond in different ways to olfactory input. ALs show absolute experience-dependency and increase in volume only if receiving direct olfactory input from ipsilateral antennae, while MB calyx volumes were unaffected by the treatment and instead show absolute age-dependency in this regard. We therefore propose that cognitive processes related to behavioural expressions are needed in order for the calyx to show experience-dependent volumetric expansions. Our results indicate that such experience-dependent volumetric expansions of calyces observed in other studies may have been caused by cognitive processes rather than by sensory input, bringing some causative clarity to a complex neural phenomenon.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190875antennal lobemushroom bodycalyxbutterflyolfactionplasticity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maertha Eriksson
Sören Nylin
Mikael A. Carlsson
spellingShingle Maertha Eriksson
Sören Nylin
Mikael A. Carlsson
Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
Royal Society Open Science
antennal lobe
mushroom body
calyx
butterfly
olfaction
plasticity
author_facet Maertha Eriksson
Sören Nylin
Mikael A. Carlsson
author_sort Maertha Eriksson
title Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
title_short Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
title_full Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
title_fullStr Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
title_full_unstemmed Insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
title_sort insect brain plasticity: effects of olfactory input on neuropil size
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Insect brains are known to express a high degree of experience-dependent structural plasticity. One brain structure in particular, the mushroom body (MB), has been attended to in numerous studies as it is implicated in complex cognitive processes such as olfactory learning and memory. It is, however, poorly understood to what extent sensory input per se affects the plasticity of the mushroom bodies. By performing unilateral blocking of olfactory input on immobilized butterflies, we were able to measure the effect of passive sensory input on the volumes of antennal lobes (ALs) and MB calyces. We showed that the primary and secondary olfactory neuropils respond in different ways to olfactory input. ALs show absolute experience-dependency and increase in volume only if receiving direct olfactory input from ipsilateral antennae, while MB calyx volumes were unaffected by the treatment and instead show absolute age-dependency in this regard. We therefore propose that cognitive processes related to behavioural expressions are needed in order for the calyx to show experience-dependent volumetric expansions. Our results indicate that such experience-dependent volumetric expansions of calyces observed in other studies may have been caused by cognitive processes rather than by sensory input, bringing some causative clarity to a complex neural phenomenon.
topic antennal lobe
mushroom body
calyx
butterfly
olfaction
plasticity
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190875
work_keys_str_mv AT maerthaeriksson insectbrainplasticityeffectsofolfactoryinputonneuropilsize
AT sorennylin insectbrainplasticityeffectsofolfactoryinputonneuropilsize
AT mikaelacarlsson insectbrainplasticityeffectsofolfactoryinputonneuropilsize
_version_ 1724441579608866816