EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: Health Technology Assessment

EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: Health Technology Assessment

The main aim of health technology assessment (HTA) is to inform decision making by health care policy makers. It is a systematic process that evaluates the use of health technologies and generally involves a critical review of international evidence related to clinical effectiveness of the health te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Amy Hunter, Karen Facey, Victoria Thomas, David Haerry, Kay Warner, Ingrid Klingmann, Matthew May, Wolf See
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-01
Series:	Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:	patient involvement patient engagement participation health technology assessment HTA EUPATI
Online Access:	https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmed.2018.00231/full

Similar Items

EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development (R&D); Guidance for Pharmaceutical Industry-Led Medicines R&D
by: Kay Warner, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Regulatory Processes
by: David Haerry, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Ethical Review of Clinical Trials
by: Ingrid Klingmann, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Editorial: The European Patients Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI) Guidelines on Patient Involvement in Research and Development
by: Per Spindler, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

The Launch of the European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Multi-Stakeholder Analysis
by: Annemiek van Rensen, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Improving Patient Involvement in the Lifecycle of Medicines: Insights From the EUPATI BE Survey
by: Lynda Grine, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Co‐construction of health technology assessment recommendations with patients: An example with cardiac defibrillator replacement
by: Marie‐Pascale Pomey, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research
by: Dawn P. Richards, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Patients and public are important stakeholders in health technology assessment but the level of involvement is low – a call to action
by: Janet L. Wale, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Developing the infrastructure for patient review in academic journals
by: Sophie Staniszewska, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Introducing Talking Health
by: Julia Stackhouse, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Introducing Talking Health
by: Julia Stackhouse, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Taking guidance from parents involved in a longitudinal birth cohort – the ROLO family advisory committee
by: N. M. Walsh, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Patient Centricity in Patient Preference Studies: The Patient Perspective
by: Eline van Overbeeke, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary
by: Tamara L. McCarron, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

The Patient Experience: Informing Practice through Identification of Meaningful Communication from the Patient’s Perspective
by: Angela Grocott, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

User involvement in a Danish project on the empowerment of cancer patients – experiences and early recommendations for further practice
by: Clara R. Jørgensen, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review
by: Tamara L. McCarron, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Utilizing patient advocates in Parkinson’s disease: A proposed framework for patient engagement and the modern metrics that can determine its success
by: Megan Feeney, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members
by: Tracy Jackson, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study
by: Lidewij Eva Vat, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)

Taking patient and public involvement online: qualitative evaluation of an online forum for palliative care and rehabilitation research
by: Lisa Jane Brighton, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Engaging indigenous patient partners in patient-oriented research: lessons from a one-year initiative
by: Marie-Claude Tremblay, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Patient-partner engagement at the Centre de recherche du CHUS in the Province of Québec, Canada: from an intuitive methodology to outreach after three years of implementation
by: Denis Boutin, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

“Could you give us an idea on what we are all doing here?” the Patient Voice in Cancer Research (PVCR) starting the journey of involvement in Ireland
by: Éidín Ní Shé, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
by: Maarten de Wit, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Partnering with patients to get better outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: towards engagement of patients in early phase trials
by: Madison Foster, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Giving patients a voice: a participatory evaluation of patient engagement in Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research
by: Lidewij Eva Vat, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities
by: James D. Harrison, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

A Critical Discussion of Patient Engagement in Research
by: Andrea Elaine Bombak, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Exploring the barriers to patient engagement in the delivery of safe care in Iranian hospitals: A qualitative study
by: Zahra Chegini, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

What are the highly important and desirable patient engagement actions for self-care as perceived by individuals living in the southern United States?
by: Tzeng HM, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

The Why, Who, What, How, and When of Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organizations: A Response to Recent Commentaries
by: Vadim Dukhanin, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Patient knowledge, experiences and preferences regarding retinoblastoma and research: A qualitative study
by: Catherine Moses, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

The Canadian retinoblastoma research advisory board: a framework for patient engagement
by: Maxwell J. Gelkopf, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
by: Vadim Dukhanin, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Addressing inequities in maternal health among women living in communities of social disadvantage and ethnic diversity
by: Cristina Fernandez Turienzo, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

“Be an ambassador for change that you would like to see”: a call to action to all stakeholders for co-creation in healthcare and medical research to improve quality of life of people with a neuromuscular disease
by: Anna Ambrosini, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Lessons from patient and parent involvement (P&PI) in a quality improvement program in cystic fibrosis care in France
by: Dominique Pougheon Bertrand, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Patients’ and researchers’ experiences with a patient board for a clinical trial on urinary tract infections
by: Imke Schilling, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)