Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation

This article analyses discussions between representatives of three schools in the theory of international relations - realism, liberalism and constructivism - on the driving factors of nuclear proliferation. The paper examines major theoretical approaches, outlined in the studies of Russian and fore...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Konstantin S. Tarasov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2015-01-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/409
id doaj-cef8f4765ba041d6ad9d68f4c44e5859
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cef8f4765ba041d6ad9d68f4c44e58592020-11-24T21:37:06ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602015-01-01434130138409Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear ProliferationKonstantin S. Tarasov0Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РоссииThis article analyses discussions between representatives of three schools in the theory of international relations - realism, liberalism and constructivism - on the driving factors of nuclear proliferation. The paper examines major theoretical approaches, outlined in the studies of Russian and foreign scientists, to the causes of nuclear weapons development, while unveiling their advantages and limitations. Much of the article has been devoted to alternative approaches, particularly, the role of mathematical modeling in assessing proliferation risks. The analysis also reveals a variety of different approaches to nuclear weapons acquisition, as well as the absence of a comprehensive proliferation theory. Based on the research results the study uncovers major factors both favoring and impeding nuclear proliferation. The author shows that the lack of consensus between realists, liberals and constructivists on the nature of proliferation led a number of scientists to an attempt to explain nuclear rationale by drawing from the insights of more than one school in the theory of IR. Detailed study of the proliferation puzzle contributes to a greater understating of contemporary international realities, helps to identify mechanisms that are most likely to deter states from obtaining nuclear weapons and is of the outmost importance in predicting short- and long-term security environment. Furthermore, analysis of the existing scientific literature on nuclear proliferation helps to determine future research agenda of the subject at hand.http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/409конструктивизмлиберализмреализмтеория международных отношениймеждународная безопасностьраспространение ядерного оружияматематическое моделированиеnuclear proliferationconstructivisminternational securityliberalismmathematical modelingrealismtheory of international relations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Konstantin S. Tarasov
spellingShingle Konstantin S. Tarasov
Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
конструктивизм
либерализм
реализм
теория международных отношений
международная безопасность
распространение ядерного оружия
математическое моделирование
nuclear proliferation
constructivism
international security
liberalism
mathematical modeling
realism
theory of international relations
author_facet Konstantin S. Tarasov
author_sort Konstantin S. Tarasov
title Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation
title_short Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation
title_full Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation
title_fullStr Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical Approaches to Nuclear Proliferation
title_sort theoretical approaches to nuclear proliferation
publisher MGIMO University Press
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
issn 2071-8160
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This article analyses discussions between representatives of three schools in the theory of international relations - realism, liberalism and constructivism - on the driving factors of nuclear proliferation. The paper examines major theoretical approaches, outlined in the studies of Russian and foreign scientists, to the causes of nuclear weapons development, while unveiling their advantages and limitations. Much of the article has been devoted to alternative approaches, particularly, the role of mathematical modeling in assessing proliferation risks. The analysis also reveals a variety of different approaches to nuclear weapons acquisition, as well as the absence of a comprehensive proliferation theory. Based on the research results the study uncovers major factors both favoring and impeding nuclear proliferation. The author shows that the lack of consensus between realists, liberals and constructivists on the nature of proliferation led a number of scientists to an attempt to explain nuclear rationale by drawing from the insights of more than one school in the theory of IR. Detailed study of the proliferation puzzle contributes to a greater understating of contemporary international realities, helps to identify mechanisms that are most likely to deter states from obtaining nuclear weapons and is of the outmost importance in predicting short- and long-term security environment. Furthermore, analysis of the existing scientific literature on nuclear proliferation helps to determine future research agenda of the subject at hand.
topic конструктивизм
либерализм
реализм
теория международных отношений
международная безопасность
распространение ядерного оружия
математическое моделирование
nuclear proliferation
constructivism
international security
liberalism
mathematical modeling
realism
theory of international relations
url http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/409
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinstarasov theoreticalapproachestonuclearproliferation
_version_ 1725938284554616832