Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy

Background and Objectives: Therapeutic plasma exchange has been in use to treat a variety of diseases and for the purpose of rational decision-making, the American Society for Apheresis has proposed guidelines for the same. The present study was undertaken to study various aspects of the plasma exch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gita Negi, Rashi Ahuja, Vibha Gupta, Dushyant Singh Gaur, Deepak Goel, Reshma Kaushik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gjtmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2468-8398;year=2018;volume=3;issue=2;spage=136;epage=139;aulast=Negi
id doaj-cef5b8d728bd456580840ef62c76eece
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cef5b8d728bd456580840ef62c76eece2020-11-24T22:10:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsGlobal Journal of Transfusion Medicine2468-83982455-88932018-01-013213613910.4103/GJTM.GJTM_26_18Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacyGita NegiRashi AhujaVibha GuptaDushyant Singh GaurDeepak GoelReshma KaushikBackground and Objectives: Therapeutic plasma exchange has been in use to treat a variety of diseases and for the purpose of rational decision-making, the American Society for Apheresis has proposed guidelines for the same. The present study was undertaken to study various aspects of the plasma exchange facility in a tertiary care center at Uttarakhand, India. Methods: The relevant demographical details (age, sex, BMI), clinical history of patient (any previous illness, any chromic disease, medications etc.), relevant investigations performed (basic haematology and immunology tests), plasma exchange procedure notes (total time taken, any adverse reactions noted), and replacement fluids used (type and amount used) were recorded and analyzed. Results: A total of 157 plasma exchange procedures were performed on 47 patients. Of these, maximum procedures were done for patients with Guillain–Barre syndrome (GBS), myasthenic crisis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The other indications were multiple myeloma, plasma cell dyscrasia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and DIC after scrub typhus and dengue. The most common adverse reaction noted was urticaria (8/19), followed by perioral tingling (3/19) and hypotension (7/19). Interpretation and Conclusions: Fifteen out of 17 patients suffering from GBS and all patients of myasthenic crisis showed recovery, however, one patient of myasthenia gravis did not show immediate improvement, but recovered after some delay. Among the patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with neurological manifestations, 3 out of 5 patients showed significant improvement. Patients who presented with other indications of plasma exchange also showed clinical benefits and the procedure resulted in quick recovery.http://www.gjtmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2468-8398;year=2018;volume=3;issue=2;spage=136;epage=139;aulast=NegiIndicationsplasmapheresistherapeutic plasma exchange
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gita Negi
Rashi Ahuja
Vibha Gupta
Dushyant Singh Gaur
Deepak Goel
Reshma Kaushik
spellingShingle Gita Negi
Rashi Ahuja
Vibha Gupta
Dushyant Singh Gaur
Deepak Goel
Reshma Kaushik
Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy
Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine
Indications
plasmapheresis
therapeutic plasma exchange
author_facet Gita Negi
Rashi Ahuja
Vibha Gupta
Dushyant Singh Gaur
Deepak Goel
Reshma Kaushik
author_sort Gita Negi
title Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy
title_short Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy
title_full Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy
title_fullStr Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic plasma exchange: A study of indications and efficacy
title_sort therapeutic plasma exchange: a study of indications and efficacy
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine
issn 2468-8398
2455-8893
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and Objectives: Therapeutic plasma exchange has been in use to treat a variety of diseases and for the purpose of rational decision-making, the American Society for Apheresis has proposed guidelines for the same. The present study was undertaken to study various aspects of the plasma exchange facility in a tertiary care center at Uttarakhand, India. Methods: The relevant demographical details (age, sex, BMI), clinical history of patient (any previous illness, any chromic disease, medications etc.), relevant investigations performed (basic haematology and immunology tests), plasma exchange procedure notes (total time taken, any adverse reactions noted), and replacement fluids used (type and amount used) were recorded and analyzed. Results: A total of 157 plasma exchange procedures were performed on 47 patients. Of these, maximum procedures were done for patients with Guillain–Barre syndrome (GBS), myasthenic crisis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The other indications were multiple myeloma, plasma cell dyscrasia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and DIC after scrub typhus and dengue. The most common adverse reaction noted was urticaria (8/19), followed by perioral tingling (3/19) and hypotension (7/19). Interpretation and Conclusions: Fifteen out of 17 patients suffering from GBS and all patients of myasthenic crisis showed recovery, however, one patient of myasthenia gravis did not show immediate improvement, but recovered after some delay. Among the patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with neurological manifestations, 3 out of 5 patients showed significant improvement. Patients who presented with other indications of plasma exchange also showed clinical benefits and the procedure resulted in quick recovery.
topic Indications
plasmapheresis
therapeutic plasma exchange
url http://www.gjtmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2468-8398;year=2018;volume=3;issue=2;spage=136;epage=139;aulast=Negi
work_keys_str_mv AT gitanegi therapeuticplasmaexchangeastudyofindicationsandefficacy
AT rashiahuja therapeuticplasmaexchangeastudyofindicationsandefficacy
AT vibhagupta therapeuticplasmaexchangeastudyofindicationsandefficacy
AT dushyantsinghgaur therapeuticplasmaexchangeastudyofindicationsandefficacy
AT deepakgoel therapeuticplasmaexchangeastudyofindicationsandefficacy
AT reshmakaushik therapeuticplasmaexchangeastudyofindicationsandefficacy
_version_ 1725806936254840832