Is cochlear implantation a safe method for habilitation/rehabilitation of deafness?
Background: The purpose of the study was to determine in which cases operative and postoperative complications appear in deaf patients with cochlear implants, the nature of these complications, and which of these complications require reoperations. Study subjects and methods: The study included 196...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Slovenian Medical Association
2011-05-01
|
| Series: | Zdravniški Vestnik |
| Online Access: | http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/165 |
| Summary: | Background: The purpose of the study was to determine in which cases operative and postoperative complications appear in deaf patients with cochlear implants, the nature of these complications, and which of these complications require reoperations. Study subjects and methods: The study included 196 deaf persons (137 children and 59 adults), who had received cochlear implant for habilitation/ rehabilitation of their hearing ability in the period from March 1996 to the end of 2009 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery in Ljubljana. The mean postoperative follow-up was 7 years (range 6 months to 13 years).
Results: We did not register any serious operative or postoperative complications. In one case, the patient experienced significant intraoperative bleeding from emissary veins of the temporal bone, and in another case, significant leakage of perilymph from the cochlea appeared. In three cases, postoperative paralysis of the facial nerve was observed, which improved in the course of several weeks. Reoperation was required in 23 cases,. The most common reason for reoperation was a malfunction of the device (12 cases). This malfunction was more common in children. In two cases, we had to reoperate because of a misplaced electrode. In all cases we reimplanted the device in the same ear as in the first operation. In two cases, inflammation of the skin above the receiver appeared 6 and 14 months after the surgery. We excised the dead skin and covered the defect with a rotation skin flap. In one of the cases, inflammation of the skin flap reappeared, demanding removal of the device and new device implanted in the other ear. In two cases, purulent mastoiditis developed 8 and 11 months after the operation. In two cases, a foreign body granuloma appeared in the surgical field, and in one case, we had to perform a timpanoplasty because of a traumatic perforation of the eardrum Conclusion: After surgical implantation of a cochlear implant, complications necessitating reoperations may occur. However, these are rare and manageable. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1318-0347 1581-0224 |