Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction. The burden of bloodstream infections (BSIs) has been warranted in Ethiopia. Globally, the emergency and raised resistance rate of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is becoming a prominent problem, and it is difficult to treat patients having sepsis. In this review, we aimed to determi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birhan Alemnew, Habtamu Biazin, Asmamaw Demis, Melese Abate Reta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Microbiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853053
id doaj-cea2a81d87b24065a2dd68f262513824
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cea2a81d87b24065a2dd68f2625138242021-07-02T13:13:57ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Microbiology1687-918X1687-91982020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88530538853053Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisBirhan Alemnew0Habtamu Biazin1Asmamaw Demis2Melese Abate Reta3Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaIntroduction. The burden of bloodstream infections (BSIs) has been warranted in Ethiopia. Globally, the emergency and raised resistance rate of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is becoming a prominent problem, and it is difficult to treat patients having sepsis. In this review, we aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients with bloodstream infections in Ethiopia. Methods. A systematic search was performed from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, HINARI, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar electronic databases using PRISMA guidelines. The data analysis was carried out using STATATM version 14 after the records were cleaned and sorted out. Results. A total of 26 studies with 8,958 blood specimens and 2,382 culture-positive bacterial isolates were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis derived a pooled culture-positive bacterial prevalence which was 25.78% (95% CI: 21.55–30.01%). The estimated pooled prevalence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates was 15.50% (95% CI: 12.84–18.15%) and 10.48 % (95% CI: 8.32–12.63%), respectively. The two common Gram-positive bacteria isolated from patients suspected of BSIs were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus with a pooled prevalence of 5.75% (95% CI: 4.58–6.92%) and S. aureus 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%). Similarly, the common Gram-negative bacterial isolates and their estimated pooled prevalence were E. coli 1.69% (95% CI: 1.21–2.16%), Klebsiella species 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%), Pseudomonas species 0.39% (95% CI: 0.08–0.70%), Salmonella species 1.09% (95% CI: 0.79–1.38%), and Streptococcus pyogenes 0.88% (95% CI: 0.54–1.22%). Conclusion. The prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients suspected to BSIs in Ethiopia remains high. Furthermore, we found a remarkable variation in the pathogen distribution across the study setting.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853053
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Birhan Alemnew
Habtamu Biazin
Asmamaw Demis
Melese Abate Reta
spellingShingle Birhan Alemnew
Habtamu Biazin
Asmamaw Demis
Melese Abate Reta
Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
International Journal of Microbiology
author_facet Birhan Alemnew
Habtamu Biazin
Asmamaw Demis
Melese Abate Reta
author_sort Birhan Alemnew
title Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort bacterial profile among patients with suspected bloodstream infections in ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Microbiology
issn 1687-918X
1687-9198
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Introduction. The burden of bloodstream infections (BSIs) has been warranted in Ethiopia. Globally, the emergency and raised resistance rate of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is becoming a prominent problem, and it is difficult to treat patients having sepsis. In this review, we aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients with bloodstream infections in Ethiopia. Methods. A systematic search was performed from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, HINARI, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar electronic databases using PRISMA guidelines. The data analysis was carried out using STATATM version 14 after the records were cleaned and sorted out. Results. A total of 26 studies with 8,958 blood specimens and 2,382 culture-positive bacterial isolates were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis derived a pooled culture-positive bacterial prevalence which was 25.78% (95% CI: 21.55–30.01%). The estimated pooled prevalence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates was 15.50% (95% CI: 12.84–18.15%) and 10.48 % (95% CI: 8.32–12.63%), respectively. The two common Gram-positive bacteria isolated from patients suspected of BSIs were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus with a pooled prevalence of 5.75% (95% CI: 4.58–6.92%) and S. aureus 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%). Similarly, the common Gram-negative bacterial isolates and their estimated pooled prevalence were E. coli 1.69% (95% CI: 1.21–2.16%), Klebsiella species 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%), Pseudomonas species 0.39% (95% CI: 0.08–0.70%), Salmonella species 1.09% (95% CI: 0.79–1.38%), and Streptococcus pyogenes 0.88% (95% CI: 0.54–1.22%). Conclusion. The prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients suspected to BSIs in Ethiopia remains high. Furthermore, we found a remarkable variation in the pathogen distribution across the study setting.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853053
work_keys_str_mv AT birhanalemnew bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT habtamubiazin bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT asmamawdemis bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meleseabatereta bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721329160030257152