Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction. The burden of bloodstream infections (BSIs) has been warranted in Ethiopia. Globally, the emergency and raised resistance rate of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is becoming a prominent problem, and it is difficult to treat patients having sepsis. In this review, we aimed to determi...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2020-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Microbiology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853053 |
id |
doaj-cea2a81d87b24065a2dd68f262513824 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cea2a81d87b24065a2dd68f2625138242021-07-02T13:13:57ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Microbiology1687-918X1687-91982020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88530538853053Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisBirhan Alemnew0Habtamu Biazin1Asmamaw Demis2Melese Abate Reta3Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaIntroduction. The burden of bloodstream infections (BSIs) has been warranted in Ethiopia. Globally, the emergency and raised resistance rate of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is becoming a prominent problem, and it is difficult to treat patients having sepsis. In this review, we aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients with bloodstream infections in Ethiopia. Methods. A systematic search was performed from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, HINARI, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar electronic databases using PRISMA guidelines. The data analysis was carried out using STATATM version 14 after the records were cleaned and sorted out. Results. A total of 26 studies with 8,958 blood specimens and 2,382 culture-positive bacterial isolates were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis derived a pooled culture-positive bacterial prevalence which was 25.78% (95% CI: 21.55–30.01%). The estimated pooled prevalence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates was 15.50% (95% CI: 12.84–18.15%) and 10.48 % (95% CI: 8.32–12.63%), respectively. The two common Gram-positive bacteria isolated from patients suspected of BSIs were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus with a pooled prevalence of 5.75% (95% CI: 4.58–6.92%) and S. aureus 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%). Similarly, the common Gram-negative bacterial isolates and their estimated pooled prevalence were E. coli 1.69% (95% CI: 1.21–2.16%), Klebsiella species 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%), Pseudomonas species 0.39% (95% CI: 0.08–0.70%), Salmonella species 1.09% (95% CI: 0.79–1.38%), and Streptococcus pyogenes 0.88% (95% CI: 0.54–1.22%). Conclusion. The prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients suspected to BSIs in Ethiopia remains high. Furthermore, we found a remarkable variation in the pathogen distribution across the study setting.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853053 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Birhan Alemnew Habtamu Biazin Asmamaw Demis Melese Abate Reta |
spellingShingle |
Birhan Alemnew Habtamu Biazin Asmamaw Demis Melese Abate Reta Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis International Journal of Microbiology |
author_facet |
Birhan Alemnew Habtamu Biazin Asmamaw Demis Melese Abate Reta |
author_sort |
Birhan Alemnew |
title |
Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bacterial Profile among Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
bacterial profile among patients with suspected bloodstream infections in ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Microbiology |
issn |
1687-918X 1687-9198 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Introduction. The burden of bloodstream infections (BSIs) has been warranted in Ethiopia. Globally, the emergency and raised resistance rate of bacterial antimicrobial resistance is becoming a prominent problem, and it is difficult to treat patients having sepsis. In this review, we aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients with bloodstream infections in Ethiopia. Methods. A systematic search was performed from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, HINARI, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar electronic databases using PRISMA guidelines. The data analysis was carried out using STATATM version 14 after the records were cleaned and sorted out. Results. A total of 26 studies with 8,958 blood specimens and 2,382 culture-positive bacterial isolates were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis derived a pooled culture-positive bacterial prevalence which was 25.78% (95% CI: 21.55–30.01%). The estimated pooled prevalence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates was 15.50% (95% CI: 12.84–18.15%) and 10.48 % (95% CI: 8.32–12.63%), respectively. The two common Gram-positive bacteria isolated from patients suspected of BSIs were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus with a pooled prevalence of 5.75% (95% CI: 4.58–6.92%) and S. aureus 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%). Similarly, the common Gram-negative bacterial isolates and their estimated pooled prevalence were E. coli 1.69% (95% CI: 1.21–2.16%), Klebsiella species 7.04 % (95% CI: 5.37–8.72%), Pseudomonas species 0.39% (95% CI: 0.08–0.70%), Salmonella species 1.09% (95% CI: 0.79–1.38%), and Streptococcus pyogenes 0.88% (95% CI: 0.54–1.22%). Conclusion. The prevalence of bacterial isolates among presumptive patients suspected to BSIs in Ethiopia remains high. Furthermore, we found a remarkable variation in the pathogen distribution across the study setting. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853053 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT birhanalemnew bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT habtamubiazin bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT asmamawdemis bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT meleseabatereta bacterialprofileamongpatientswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfectionsinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1721329160030257152 |