Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective

We translate between biophysical and economic metrics that characterize the role of energy in the economy. Specifically, using data from the International Energy Agency, we estimate the energy intensity ratio (EIR), a price-based proxy for a power return ratio (PRR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carey W. King, John P. Maxwell, Alyssa Donovan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-11-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12346
id doaj-ce9deea0f67043beb74008061a21f4b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce9deea0f67043beb74008061a21f4b12020-11-25T00:19:22ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732015-11-01811129491297410.3390/en81112346en81112346Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity PerspectiveCarey W. King0John P. Maxwell1Alyssa Donovan2Energy Institute, the University of Texas at Austin, 2304 Whitis Ave., C2400, Austin, TX 78712, USASenate Fiscal Agency, P.O. Box 30036 Lansing, MI 48909-7536, USAJackson School of Geosciences, the University of Texas at Austin, 2275 Speedway, C9000, Austin, TX 78712, USAWe translate between biophysical and economic metrics that characterize the role of energy in the economy. Specifically, using data from the International Energy Agency, we estimate the energy intensity ratio (EIR), a price-based proxy for a power return ratio (PRR ∼ P out / P invested ). The EIR is a useful metric, because for most countries and energy commodities, it can indicate the biophysical trends of net energy when data are too scarce to perform an original net energy analysis. We calculate EIR for natural gas, coal, petroleum and electricity for forty-four countries from 1978 to 2010. Global EIR values generally rise from 1978 to 1998, decline from 1998 to 2008 and then slightly rebound. These trends indicate one interpretation of the net energy of the world economy. To add perspective to our recent, but short, time series, we perform the same calculations for historical England and United Kingdom energy prices to demonstrate that a given energy price translates to different PRRs (EIR in this case) depending on the structure of the economy and technology. We review the formulation of PRRs and energy return ratios (ERR ∼ E out / E invested ) to indicate why PRRs translate to (the inverse of) energy prices and ERRs translate to (the inverse of) energy costs. We show why for any given value of an ERR or PRR, there is not a single corresponding energy cost or price, and vice versa. These principles in turn provide the basis to perform better modeling of future energy scenarios (e.g., low-carbon transition) by considering the relationship between economic metrics (cost and price) and biophysical metrics (energy and power return ratios) based on energy, material and power flows.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12346energynet energypricecosteconomicslife cycle assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carey W. King
John P. Maxwell
Alyssa Donovan
spellingShingle Carey W. King
John P. Maxwell
Alyssa Donovan
Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective
Energies
energy
net energy
price
cost
economics
life cycle assessment
author_facet Carey W. King
John P. Maxwell
Alyssa Donovan
author_sort Carey W. King
title Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective
title_short Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective
title_full Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective
title_fullStr Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective
title_sort comparing world economic and net energy metrics, part 1: single technology and commodity perspective
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2015-11-01
description We translate between biophysical and economic metrics that characterize the role of energy in the economy. Specifically, using data from the International Energy Agency, we estimate the energy intensity ratio (EIR), a price-based proxy for a power return ratio (PRR ∼ P out / P invested ). The EIR is a useful metric, because for most countries and energy commodities, it can indicate the biophysical trends of net energy when data are too scarce to perform an original net energy analysis. We calculate EIR for natural gas, coal, petroleum and electricity for forty-four countries from 1978 to 2010. Global EIR values generally rise from 1978 to 1998, decline from 1998 to 2008 and then slightly rebound. These trends indicate one interpretation of the net energy of the world economy. To add perspective to our recent, but short, time series, we perform the same calculations for historical England and United Kingdom energy prices to demonstrate that a given energy price translates to different PRRs (EIR in this case) depending on the structure of the economy and technology. We review the formulation of PRRs and energy return ratios (ERR ∼ E out / E invested ) to indicate why PRRs translate to (the inverse of) energy prices and ERRs translate to (the inverse of) energy costs. We show why for any given value of an ERR or PRR, there is not a single corresponding energy cost or price, and vice versa. These principles in turn provide the basis to perform better modeling of future energy scenarios (e.g., low-carbon transition) by considering the relationship between economic metrics (cost and price) and biophysical metrics (energy and power return ratios) based on energy, material and power flows.
topic energy
net energy
price
cost
economics
life cycle assessment
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12346
work_keys_str_mv AT careywking comparingworldeconomicandnetenergymetricspart1singletechnologyandcommodityperspective
AT johnpmaxwell comparingworldeconomicandnetenergymetricspart1singletechnologyandcommodityperspective
AT alyssadonovan comparingworldeconomicandnetenergymetricspart1singletechnologyandcommodityperspective
_version_ 1725371831005741056