Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study

Abstract Background The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Methods Patients with NVG who underwent Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery or trabeculectomy as a primary glaucom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazuyuki Kawabata, Kohei Shobayashi, Keiichiro Iwao, Eri Takahashi, Hidenobu Tanihara, Toshihiro Inoue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1083-4
id doaj-ce87033e4bbe4fa79df12eae9f6a1a32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce87033e4bbe4fa79df12eae9f6a1a322020-11-25T02:25:12ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152019-03-011911610.1186/s12886-019-1083-4Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative studyKazuyuki Kawabata0Kohei Shobayashi1Keiichiro Iwao2Eri Takahashi3Hidenobu Tanihara4Toshihiro Inoue5Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityAbstract Background The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Methods Patients with NVG who underwent Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery or trabeculectomy as a primary glaucoma surgery between March 2013 and October 2015 were included in the study, and their medical charts were retrospectively reviewed. The Ex-PRESS® and trabeculectomy groups included 14 eyes and 30 eyes, respectively. Surgical failure was defined by an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥21 mmHg (condition A) or ≥ 18 mmHg (condition B); Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess efficacies. Results Kaplan–Meier survival analyses indicated that the probabilities of success at 1 year for the Ex-PRESS® group were 25.7 and 31.8% based on complete and qualified success under condition A, respectively. The corresponding values for the trabeculectomy group were 47.8 and 69.3%, and there was a significant difference in qualified success with condition A (Fig. 1; P = 0.018), while there were no significant differences in the other criteria. Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and higher intraocular pressure were independent prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazards model analyses in qualified success as in condition A (P = 0.012 and 0.0495, respectively). The occurrences of postsurgical hyphema and bleb leaks were significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.005 and 0.008, respectively). Conclusion During a 1 year follow-up, Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery was a less effective, but safer treatment for NVG compared with trabeculectomy.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1083-4Neovascular glaucomaTrabeculectomyEx-press mini shuntEfficacySafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kazuyuki Kawabata
Kohei Shobayashi
Keiichiro Iwao
Eri Takahashi
Hidenobu Tanihara
Toshihiro Inoue
spellingShingle Kazuyuki Kawabata
Kohei Shobayashi
Keiichiro Iwao
Eri Takahashi
Hidenobu Tanihara
Toshihiro Inoue
Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
BMC Ophthalmology
Neovascular glaucoma
Trabeculectomy
Ex-press mini shunt
Efficacy
Safety
author_facet Kazuyuki Kawabata
Kohei Shobayashi
Keiichiro Iwao
Eri Takahashi
Hidenobu Tanihara
Toshihiro Inoue
author_sort Kazuyuki Kawabata
title Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort efficacy and safety of ex-press® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Methods Patients with NVG who underwent Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery or trabeculectomy as a primary glaucoma surgery between March 2013 and October 2015 were included in the study, and their medical charts were retrospectively reviewed. The Ex-PRESS® and trabeculectomy groups included 14 eyes and 30 eyes, respectively. Surgical failure was defined by an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥21 mmHg (condition A) or ≥ 18 mmHg (condition B); Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess efficacies. Results Kaplan–Meier survival analyses indicated that the probabilities of success at 1 year for the Ex-PRESS® group were 25.7 and 31.8% based on complete and qualified success under condition A, respectively. The corresponding values for the trabeculectomy group were 47.8 and 69.3%, and there was a significant difference in qualified success with condition A (Fig. 1; P = 0.018), while there were no significant differences in the other criteria. Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and higher intraocular pressure were independent prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazards model analyses in qualified success as in condition A (P = 0.012 and 0.0495, respectively). The occurrences of postsurgical hyphema and bleb leaks were significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.005 and 0.008, respectively). Conclusion During a 1 year follow-up, Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery was a less effective, but safer treatment for NVG compared with trabeculectomy.
topic Neovascular glaucoma
Trabeculectomy
Ex-press mini shunt
Efficacy
Safety
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1083-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kazuyukikawabata efficacyandsafetyofexpressminishuntsurgeryversustrabeculectomyforneovascularglaucomaaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT koheishobayashi efficacyandsafetyofexpressminishuntsurgeryversustrabeculectomyforneovascularglaucomaaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT keiichiroiwao efficacyandsafetyofexpressminishuntsurgeryversustrabeculectomyforneovascularglaucomaaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT eritakahashi efficacyandsafetyofexpressminishuntsurgeryversustrabeculectomyforneovascularglaucomaaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT hidenobutanihara efficacyandsafetyofexpressminishuntsurgeryversustrabeculectomyforneovascularglaucomaaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT toshihiroinoue efficacyandsafetyofexpressminishuntsurgeryversustrabeculectomyforneovascularglaucomaaretrospectivecomparativestudy
_version_ 1724852452695474176