Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules
Research on judgment and decision making has suggested that the System 2 process of slow thinking can help people to improve their decision making by reducing well-established statistical decision biases (including base rate neglect, probability matching, and the conjunction fallacy). In a large pre...
Main Authors: | M. Asher Lawson, Richard P. Larrick, Jack B. Soll |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190326c/jdm190326c.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Activating
reflective thinking with decision justification and debiasing training
by: Ozan Isler, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)
by: Guillaume Beaulac, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)
by: Guillaume Beaulac, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Mental Simulation as a Remedy for Biased Reasoning
by: Daša Strachanová, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Quota-based debiasing can decrease representation of the most under-represented groups
by: I. Smirnov, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)