Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose. Hip fracture is a common injury in geriatric populations, which is associated with poor quality of life. However, the ideal anesthesia technique for this disease is yet to be identified. This study aimed to compare the combined lumbar-sacral plexus block (CLSB) plus general anesthesia (bisp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lili Tang, Panpan Fang, Yuxin Fang, Yao Lu, Guanghong Xu, Xuesheng Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685497
id doaj-ce717b902c5e473686b54a77f6d3881e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce717b902c5e473686b54a77f6d3881e2021-05-10T00:26:59ZengHindawi LimitedEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine1741-42882021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6685497Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled TrialLili Tang0Panpan Fang1Yuxin Fang2Yao Lu3Guanghong Xu4Xuesheng Liu5Department of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyPurpose. Hip fracture is a common injury in geriatric populations, which is associated with poor quality of life. However, the ideal anesthesia technique for this disease is yet to be identified. This study aimed to compare the combined lumbar-sacral plexus block (CLSB) plus general anesthesia (bispectral index (BIS) 60–80) with the unilateral spinal anesthesia (SA) on activity of daily living in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods. A total of 124 elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in the SA group received light-specific gravity spinal anesthesia, and patients in the CLSB group received lumbar and sacral plexus block with general anesthesia (BIS 60–80). The primary outcomes were 30-day activity of daily living (ADL). The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, postoperative delirium, in-hospital cost, and major complications. Results. The ADL scores of postoperative day 30 (POD30) in the CLSB group are higher than those in the SA group (27.34 ± 7.01 versus 24.70 ± 6.40, P=0.045). Compared to preoperative ADL scores, there were higher increased scores in the CLSB group than in POD30 (CLSB group 8.09 ± 3.39 versus SA group 4.87 ± 3.90, P<0.001). Mild-to-moderate pain did not have differences between the two groups (rest pain: 3 versus 2, P=0.344; motion pain: 5 versus 4, P=0.073). There were no significant differences in incidence of postoperative delirium, PONV, and other complications. Conclusion. The unilateral SA can reduce the deterioration of ADL after hip fracture surgery and provide a better postoperative recovery.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685497
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lili Tang
Panpan Fang
Yuxin Fang
Yao Lu
Guanghong Xu
Xuesheng Liu
spellingShingle Lili Tang
Panpan Fang
Yuxin Fang
Yao Lu
Guanghong Xu
Xuesheng Liu
Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
author_facet Lili Tang
Panpan Fang
Yuxin Fang
Yao Lu
Guanghong Xu
Xuesheng Liu
author_sort Lili Tang
title Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of effects between combined lumbar-sacral plexus block plus general anesthesia and unilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
issn 1741-4288
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose. Hip fracture is a common injury in geriatric populations, which is associated with poor quality of life. However, the ideal anesthesia technique for this disease is yet to be identified. This study aimed to compare the combined lumbar-sacral plexus block (CLSB) plus general anesthesia (bispectral index (BIS) 60–80) with the unilateral spinal anesthesia (SA) on activity of daily living in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods. A total of 124 elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in the SA group received light-specific gravity spinal anesthesia, and patients in the CLSB group received lumbar and sacral plexus block with general anesthesia (BIS 60–80). The primary outcomes were 30-day activity of daily living (ADL). The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, postoperative delirium, in-hospital cost, and major complications. Results. The ADL scores of postoperative day 30 (POD30) in the CLSB group are higher than those in the SA group (27.34 ± 7.01 versus 24.70 ± 6.40, P=0.045). Compared to preoperative ADL scores, there were higher increased scores in the CLSB group than in POD30 (CLSB group 8.09 ± 3.39 versus SA group 4.87 ± 3.90, P<0.001). Mild-to-moderate pain did not have differences between the two groups (rest pain: 3 versus 2, P=0.344; motion pain: 5 versus 4, P=0.073). There were no significant differences in incidence of postoperative delirium, PONV, and other complications. Conclusion. The unilateral SA can reduce the deterioration of ADL after hip fracture surgery and provide a better postoperative recovery.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685497
work_keys_str_mv AT lilitang comparisonofeffectsbetweencombinedlumbarsacralplexusblockplusgeneralanesthesiaandunilateralspinalanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoinghipfracturesurgeryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT panpanfang comparisonofeffectsbetweencombinedlumbarsacralplexusblockplusgeneralanesthesiaandunilateralspinalanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoinghipfracturesurgeryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuxinfang comparisonofeffectsbetweencombinedlumbarsacralplexusblockplusgeneralanesthesiaandunilateralspinalanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoinghipfracturesurgeryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yaolu comparisonofeffectsbetweencombinedlumbarsacralplexusblockplusgeneralanesthesiaandunilateralspinalanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoinghipfracturesurgeryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guanghongxu comparisonofeffectsbetweencombinedlumbarsacralplexusblockplusgeneralanesthesiaandunilateralspinalanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoinghipfracturesurgeryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xueshengliu comparisonofeffectsbetweencombinedlumbarsacralplexusblockplusgeneralanesthesiaandunilateralspinalanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoinghipfracturesurgeryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721453866239655936