Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones

Abstract Significant others provide individuals with a sense of safety and security. However, the mechanisms that underlie attachment-induced safety are hardly understood. Recent research has shown beneficial effects when viewing pictures of the romantic partner, leading to reduced pain experience a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Morato, Pedro Guerra, Florian Bublatzky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84921-3
id doaj-ce5e4810baf141558e560afc0f6f926a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce5e4810baf141558e560afc0f6f926a2021-03-11T12:17:21ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-84921-3Verbal threat learning does not spare loved onesCristina Morato0Pedro Guerra1Florian Bublatzky2Department of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of GranadaDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of GranadaCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg UniversityAbstract Significant others provide individuals with a sense of safety and security. However, the mechanisms that underlie attachment-induced safety are hardly understood. Recent research has shown beneficial effects when viewing pictures of the romantic partner, leading to reduced pain experience and defensive responding. Building upon this, we examined the inhibitory capacity of loved face pictures on fear learning in an instructed threat paradigm. Pictures of loved familiar or unknown individuals served as signals for either threat of electric shocks or safety, while a broad set of psychophysiological measures was recorded. We assumed that a long-term learning history of beneficial relations interferes with social threat learning. Nevertheless, results yielded a typical pattern of physiological defense activation towards threat cues, regardless of whether threat was signaled by an unknown or a loved face. These findings call into question the notion that pictures of loved individuals are shielded against becoming threat cues, with implications for attachment and trauma research.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84921-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cristina Morato
Pedro Guerra
Florian Bublatzky
spellingShingle Cristina Morato
Pedro Guerra
Florian Bublatzky
Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
Scientific Reports
author_facet Cristina Morato
Pedro Guerra
Florian Bublatzky
author_sort Cristina Morato
title Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
title_short Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
title_full Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
title_fullStr Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
title_full_unstemmed Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
title_sort verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Significant others provide individuals with a sense of safety and security. However, the mechanisms that underlie attachment-induced safety are hardly understood. Recent research has shown beneficial effects when viewing pictures of the romantic partner, leading to reduced pain experience and defensive responding. Building upon this, we examined the inhibitory capacity of loved face pictures on fear learning in an instructed threat paradigm. Pictures of loved familiar or unknown individuals served as signals for either threat of electric shocks or safety, while a broad set of psychophysiological measures was recorded. We assumed that a long-term learning history of beneficial relations interferes with social threat learning. Nevertheless, results yielded a typical pattern of physiological defense activation towards threat cues, regardless of whether threat was signaled by an unknown or a loved face. These findings call into question the notion that pictures of loved individuals are shielded against becoming threat cues, with implications for attachment and trauma research.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84921-3
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinamorato verbalthreatlearningdoesnotsparelovedones
AT pedroguerra verbalthreatlearningdoesnotsparelovedones
AT florianbublatzky verbalthreatlearningdoesnotsparelovedones
_version_ 1724224515003645952