The Scholarship of Critique and Power

Critique can be defined as disciplinary feedback, analysis, or assessment provided to an individual or within a group, be it a classroom or a team. At a fundamental level, it is an exchange of ideas, impressions, evaluations, opinions, reflections, judgments, speculations, or suggestions to oneself...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiona Camille Martin-Thomsen, Gaia Scagnetti, Siobhan R. McPhee, Ashley B. Akenson, Dana Hagerman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2021-03-01
Series:Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/71062
id doaj-ce5c8bf47865470da1692900629197ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce5c8bf47865470da1692900629197ac2021-03-26T14:37:11ZengUniversity of CalgaryTeaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal2167-47792167-47872021-03-019110.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.19The Scholarship of Critique and PowerTiona Camille Martin-Thomsen0Gaia Scagnetti 1Siobhan R. McPhee2Ashley B. Akenson3Dana Hagerman4Pratt InstitutePratt InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaTennessee Technological UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin Whitewater Critique can be defined as disciplinary feedback, analysis, or assessment provided to an individual or within a group, be it a classroom or a team. At a fundamental level, it is an exchange of ideas, impressions, evaluations, opinions, reflections, judgments, speculations, or suggestions to oneself or between two or more participants in a defined context. Scholars describe critique as a signature pedagogy in many disciplines, a cornerstone of the educational experience. There has been scant critical analysis of how critique also represents a performance of power with roots in positions of authority, expertise, or assigned roles. Such power dynamics have been explored in some areas within SoTL, for example in scholarship on assessment, epistemic disobedience, social justice, feminist pedagogies, and critical race theory. However, this has generally not been the case within the scholarship on critique. To better understand the dimensions of power in the context of critique we developed a conceptual framework that can be applied at the individual level (teacher to student, student to student) as well as the systemic level (critique as a construct of cultural hegemony in a specific episteme). Drawing from theoretical and pedagogical literature in areas such as cultural studies, whiteness studies, design education, and assessment, the conceptual framework defines power in three main expressions: power as inequity, power as authority, and power as cultural hegemony. The framework can be used to identify and define power within the critique context and to also inform reflection and shift perspectives at various academic levels. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/71062critique and powerfeedbackcultural hegemonyinequityauthoritywhite habitus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tiona Camille Martin-Thomsen
Gaia Scagnetti
Siobhan R. McPhee
Ashley B. Akenson
Dana Hagerman
spellingShingle Tiona Camille Martin-Thomsen
Gaia Scagnetti
Siobhan R. McPhee
Ashley B. Akenson
Dana Hagerman
The Scholarship of Critique and Power
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
critique and power
feedback
cultural hegemony
inequity
authority
white habitus
author_facet Tiona Camille Martin-Thomsen
Gaia Scagnetti
Siobhan R. McPhee
Ashley B. Akenson
Dana Hagerman
author_sort Tiona Camille Martin-Thomsen
title The Scholarship of Critique and Power
title_short The Scholarship of Critique and Power
title_full The Scholarship of Critique and Power
title_fullStr The Scholarship of Critique and Power
title_full_unstemmed The Scholarship of Critique and Power
title_sort scholarship of critique and power
publisher University of Calgary
series Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
issn 2167-4779
2167-4787
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Critique can be defined as disciplinary feedback, analysis, or assessment provided to an individual or within a group, be it a classroom or a team. At a fundamental level, it is an exchange of ideas, impressions, evaluations, opinions, reflections, judgments, speculations, or suggestions to oneself or between two or more participants in a defined context. Scholars describe critique as a signature pedagogy in many disciplines, a cornerstone of the educational experience. There has been scant critical analysis of how critique also represents a performance of power with roots in positions of authority, expertise, or assigned roles. Such power dynamics have been explored in some areas within SoTL, for example in scholarship on assessment, epistemic disobedience, social justice, feminist pedagogies, and critical race theory. However, this has generally not been the case within the scholarship on critique. To better understand the dimensions of power in the context of critique we developed a conceptual framework that can be applied at the individual level (teacher to student, student to student) as well as the systemic level (critique as a construct of cultural hegemony in a specific episteme). Drawing from theoretical and pedagogical literature in areas such as cultural studies, whiteness studies, design education, and assessment, the conceptual framework defines power in three main expressions: power as inequity, power as authority, and power as cultural hegemony. The framework can be used to identify and define power within the critique context and to also inform reflection and shift perspectives at various academic levels.
topic critique and power
feedback
cultural hegemony
inequity
authority
white habitus
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/71062
work_keys_str_mv AT tionacamillemartinthomsen thescholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT gaiascagnetti thescholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT siobhanrmcphee thescholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT ashleybakenson thescholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT danahagerman thescholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT tionacamillemartinthomsen scholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT gaiascagnetti scholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT siobhanrmcphee scholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT ashleybakenson scholarshipofcritiqueandpower
AT danahagerman scholarshipofcritiqueandpower
_version_ 1724202076267872256