The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy

The study presented in this article — which is a study of rural employment in the informal economy — relies on data from the following surveys of households and individuals — “Comprehensive monitoring of the population’s living conditions” and “Selective monitoring of income and participation in soc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariya N. Mukhanova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2017-06-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5161/submission/proof/5161-61-10455-1-10-20180124.pdf
id doaj-ce3f741c88844fa8913ce247e4ed2ef1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce3f741c88844fa8913ce247e4ed2ef12020-11-25T02:01:03ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952017-06-01232749510.19181/socjour.2017.23.2.51615161The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal EconomyMariya N. Mukhanova0Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe study presented in this article — which is a study of rural employment in the informal economy — relies on data from the following surveys of households and individuals — “Comprehensive monitoring of the population’s living conditions” and “Selective monitoring of income and participation in social programs”, both carried out by Rosstat in 2011–2015 and commissioned by the Russian government. Rural residents ages 16 and up were interviewed in every region of the 9 Federal districts, including the Crimean Federal district. It is revealed that the transition to a market economy during the 1990’s was accompanied by increasing unemployment and poverty, transformations in the labor market, and the emergence of various forms of self-employment. A decrease in the level of rural inhabitants employed in farming, together with an increase in other fields of the agro-industrial complex (AIC), lead to sectoral mobility (relocation), the transformation of rural social structure, and the development of an informal sector, one third of those employed in which are rural residents. Employment in the informal economy is quite a risky endeavor, which in many ways makes the agrarian labor market unstable as a market economy institution. However, despite the informal sector being characterized by a primitive level of technology, low capital-intensity, as well as low levels of human capital, nevertheless, it compensates the expenses of Russian village social development by way of absorbing labor resources, which, had they ended up outside of this sector, might have stayed out of business.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5161/submission/proof/5161-61-10455-1-10-20180124.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariya N. Mukhanova
spellingShingle Mariya N. Mukhanova
The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy
Социологический журнал
author_facet Mariya N. Mukhanova
author_sort Mariya N. Mukhanova
title The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy
title_short The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy
title_full The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy
title_fullStr The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy
title_full_unstemmed The Employment Structure of Rural Inhabitants in the Informal Economy
title_sort employment structure of rural inhabitants in the informal economy
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The study presented in this article — which is a study of rural employment in the informal economy — relies on data from the following surveys of households and individuals — “Comprehensive monitoring of the population’s living conditions” and “Selective monitoring of income and participation in social programs”, both carried out by Rosstat in 2011–2015 and commissioned by the Russian government. Rural residents ages 16 and up were interviewed in every region of the 9 Federal districts, including the Crimean Federal district. It is revealed that the transition to a market economy during the 1990’s was accompanied by increasing unemployment and poverty, transformations in the labor market, and the emergence of various forms of self-employment. A decrease in the level of rural inhabitants employed in farming, together with an increase in other fields of the agro-industrial complex (AIC), lead to sectoral mobility (relocation), the transformation of rural social structure, and the development of an informal sector, one third of those employed in which are rural residents. Employment in the informal economy is quite a risky endeavor, which in many ways makes the agrarian labor market unstable as a market economy institution. However, despite the informal sector being characterized by a primitive level of technology, low capital-intensity, as well as low levels of human capital, nevertheless, it compensates the expenses of Russian village social development by way of absorbing labor resources, which, had they ended up outside of this sector, might have stayed out of business.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5161/submission/proof/5161-61-10455-1-10-20180124.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariyanmukhanova theemploymentstructureofruralinhabitantsintheinformaleconomy
AT mariyanmukhanova employmentstructureofruralinhabitantsintheinformaleconomy
_version_ 1724959120100950016