Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review

Gait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shmuel Springer, Galit Yogev Seligmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-02-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/2/194
id doaj-ce3cf6e0705d424c8c483b2b653a0cb5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce3cf6e0705d424c8c483b2b653a0cb52020-11-24T21:59:10ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202016-02-0116219410.3390/s16020194s16020194Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused ReviewShmuel Springer0Galit Yogev Seligmann1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences ,Ariel University, Kiryat Hamda, Ariel 40700, IsraelFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, IsraelGait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically evaluate the literature describing the concurrent validity of using the Kinect as a gait analysis instrument. An online search of PubMed, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases was performed. Included were studies in which walking was assessed with the Kinect and another gold standard device, and consisted of at least one numerical finding of spatiotemporal or kinematic measures. Our search identified 366 papers, from which 12 relevant studies were retrieved. The results demonstrate that the Kinect is valid only for some spatiotemporal gait parameters. Although the kinematic parameters measured by the Kinect followed the trend of the joint trajectories, they showed poor validity and large errors. In conclusion, the Kinect may have the potential to be used as a tool for measuring spatiotemporal aspects of gait, yet standardized methods should be established, and future examinations with both healthy subjects and clinical participants are required in order to integrate the Kinect as a clinical gait analysis tool.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/2/194Kinectvaliditygait analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shmuel Springer
Galit Yogev Seligmann
spellingShingle Shmuel Springer
Galit Yogev Seligmann
Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
Sensors
Kinect
validity
gait analysis
author_facet Shmuel Springer
Galit Yogev Seligmann
author_sort Shmuel Springer
title Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_short Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_full Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_fullStr Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_sort validity of the kinect for gait assessment: a focused review
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Gait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically evaluate the literature describing the concurrent validity of using the Kinect as a gait analysis instrument. An online search of PubMed, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases was performed. Included were studies in which walking was assessed with the Kinect and another gold standard device, and consisted of at least one numerical finding of spatiotemporal or kinematic measures. Our search identified 366 papers, from which 12 relevant studies were retrieved. The results demonstrate that the Kinect is valid only for some spatiotemporal gait parameters. Although the kinematic parameters measured by the Kinect followed the trend of the joint trajectories, they showed poor validity and large errors. In conclusion, the Kinect may have the potential to be used as a tool for measuring spatiotemporal aspects of gait, yet standardized methods should be established, and future examinations with both healthy subjects and clinical participants are required in order to integrate the Kinect as a clinical gait analysis tool.
topic Kinect
validity
gait analysis
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/2/194
work_keys_str_mv AT shmuelspringer validityofthekinectforgaitassessmentafocusedreview
AT galityogevseligmann validityofthekinectforgaitassessmentafocusedreview
_version_ 1725848695392436224