Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention

Abstract Deep saliency models represent the current state-of-the-art for predicting where humans look in real-world scenes. However, for deep saliency models to inform cognitive theories of attention, we need to know how deep saliency models prioritize different scene features to predict where peopl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor R. Hayes, John M. Henderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97879-z
id doaj-ce387fe2b53e4987b3f74cda0a3e4bf3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce387fe2b53e4987b3f74cda0a3e4bf32021-09-19T11:33:28ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-09-0111111310.1038/s41598-021-97879-zDeep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attentionTaylor R. Hayes0John M. Henderson1Center for Mind and Brain, University of CaliforniaCenter for Mind and Brain, University of CaliforniaAbstract Deep saliency models represent the current state-of-the-art for predicting where humans look in real-world scenes. However, for deep saliency models to inform cognitive theories of attention, we need to know how deep saliency models prioritize different scene features to predict where people look. Here we open the black box of three prominent deep saliency models (MSI-Net, DeepGaze II, and SAM-ResNet) using an approach that models the association between attention, deep saliency model output, and low-, mid-, and high-level scene features. Specifically, we measured the association between each deep saliency model and low-level image saliency, mid-level contour symmetry and junctions, and high-level meaning by applying a mixed effects modeling approach to a large eye movement dataset. We found that all three deep saliency models were most strongly associated with high-level and low-level features, but exhibited qualitatively different feature weightings and interaction patterns. These findings suggest that prominent deep saliency models are primarily learning image features associated with high-level scene meaning and low-level image saliency and highlight the importance of moving beyond simply benchmarking performance.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97879-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taylor R. Hayes
John M. Henderson
spellingShingle Taylor R. Hayes
John M. Henderson
Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
Scientific Reports
author_facet Taylor R. Hayes
John M. Henderson
author_sort Taylor R. Hayes
title Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
title_short Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
title_full Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
title_fullStr Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
title_full_unstemmed Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
title_sort deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Deep saliency models represent the current state-of-the-art for predicting where humans look in real-world scenes. However, for deep saliency models to inform cognitive theories of attention, we need to know how deep saliency models prioritize different scene features to predict where people look. Here we open the black box of three prominent deep saliency models (MSI-Net, DeepGaze II, and SAM-ResNet) using an approach that models the association between attention, deep saliency model output, and low-, mid-, and high-level scene features. Specifically, we measured the association between each deep saliency model and low-level image saliency, mid-level contour symmetry and junctions, and high-level meaning by applying a mixed effects modeling approach to a large eye movement dataset. We found that all three deep saliency models were most strongly associated with high-level and low-level features, but exhibited qualitatively different feature weightings and interaction patterns. These findings suggest that prominent deep saliency models are primarily learning image features associated with high-level scene meaning and low-level image saliency and highlight the importance of moving beyond simply benchmarking performance.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97879-z
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorrhayes deepsaliencymodelslearnlowmidandhighlevelfeaturestopredictsceneattention
AT johnmhenderson deepsaliencymodelslearnlowmidandhighlevelfeaturestopredictsceneattention
_version_ 1717375724618252288