Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples
With this study, it is aimed to investigate the effects of illumination in urban park areas on the user, inquire about liking and preferences of the users about illumination and examine the aesthetic effect of the current design on users. In this respect, two urban parks were chosen as the study ar...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/issue/31062/289510 |
id |
doaj-ce3387358091408a89030ec59759bc12 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ce3387358091408a89030ec59759bc122020-11-25T01:02:20ZengArtvin Çoruh ÜniversitesiArtvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi2146-698X2146-698X2017-11-0118213715110.17474/artvinofd.289510Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examplesBanu Çiçek KurdoğluTuğba Üstün TopalWith this study, it is aimed to investigate the effects of illumination in urban park areas on the user, inquire about liking and preferences of the users about illumination and examine the aesthetic effect of the current design on users. In this respect, two urban parks were chosen as the study area which have similar characteristics in terms of their usage principles, their location, accessibility and qualities in the city, but with two different approaches: traditional and modern, in terms of lighting types and techniques used. For this purpose, a questionnaire which prepared about lighting design was applied to their own users of both parks. After asking questions to identify users and determine their usage, "Semantic differentiation scale" was used for the semantic assessment of illuminated place components and elements of the two parks (pedestrian paths and ladders, seating areas, etc.) by the users. As a result of the statistical analysis of the data, it was seen that 75% of Meydan Park and 76% of Atapark are safe, place components and elements respectively for both parks, seating areas are reassuring with values of 3.46, 3.21; resting with 3.38, 3.34; moving with 3.25, 3.04; water elements reassuring with 3.68, 3.60; herbal elements were reassuring with 3.13, 3.02, effective with 3.04, 3.12, refreshing with 3.19, 3.09. These results show that although Meydan Park and Atapark differ in terms of lighting types and techniques, this does not cause great differences in terms of contribution from the security, aesthetics and economics, and similarly there is no big difference in users' liking and preferences related to lightinghttp://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/issue/31062/289510LightingUrban parkQuestionnaireMeydan ParkAtaparkTrabzon |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Banu Çiçek Kurdoğlu Tuğba Üstün Topal |
spellingShingle |
Banu Çiçek Kurdoğlu Tuğba Üstün Topal Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi Lighting Urban park Questionnaire Meydan Park Atapark Trabzon |
author_facet |
Banu Çiçek Kurdoğlu Tuğba Üstün Topal |
author_sort |
Banu Çiçek Kurdoğlu |
title |
Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples |
title_short |
Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples |
title_full |
Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: Meydan park and Atapark examples |
title_sort |
evaluation of illuminated city parks by users: meydan park and atapark examples |
publisher |
Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi |
series |
Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi |
issn |
2146-698X 2146-698X |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
With this study, it is aimed to investigate the effects of illumination in urban park areas on the user, inquire about liking and preferences of the users about illumination and examine the aesthetic effect of the current design on users. In this respect, two urban parks were chosen as the study area which have similar characteristics in terms of their usage principles, their location, accessibility and qualities in the city, but with two different approaches: traditional and modern, in terms of lighting types and techniques used. For this purpose, a questionnaire which prepared about lighting design was applied to their own users of both parks. After asking questions to identify users and determine their usage, "Semantic differentiation scale" was used for the semantic assessment of illuminated place components and elements of the two parks (pedestrian paths and ladders, seating areas, etc.) by the users. As a result of the statistical analysis of the data, it was seen that 75% of Meydan Park and 76% of Atapark are safe, place components and elements respectively for both parks, seating areas are reassuring with values of 3.46, 3.21; resting with 3.38, 3.34; moving with 3.25, 3.04; water elements reassuring with 3.68, 3.60; herbal elements were reassuring with 3.13, 3.02, effective with 3.04, 3.12, refreshing with 3.19, 3.09. These results show that although Meydan Park and Atapark differ in terms of lighting types and techniques, this does not cause great differences in terms of contribution from the security, aesthetics and economics, and similarly there is no big difference in users' liking and preferences related to lighting |
topic |
Lighting Urban park Questionnaire Meydan Park Atapark Trabzon |
url |
http://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/issue/31062/289510 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT banucicekkurdoglu evaluationofilluminatedcityparksbyusersmeydanparkandataparkexamples AT tugbaustuntopal evaluationofilluminatedcityparksbyusersmeydanparkandataparkexamples |
_version_ |
1725205501241720832 |