Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the score systems of Cassano and Sanz and suggest a new one. DESIGN: Case series. LOCATION: Teaching hospitals: EPM UNIFESP and Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. PARTICIPANTS: 59 patients diagnosed from 1979 to 1992. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of clinical-laboratorial data. MEA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Xisto Souto, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaile, José Eduardo Cajado Moncau, Lígia Niero-Melo, Gisele Wally Braga, Maria Regina Regis Silva, José Kerbauy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina
Series:São Paulo Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801997000500005&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-ce2cb243b78742de99fd231c3f09ad72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce2cb243b78742de99fd231c3f09ad722020-11-24T20:58:48ZengAssociação Paulista de MedicinaSão Paulo Medical Journal1806-946011551537154110.1590/S1516-31801997000500005S1516-31801997000500005Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systemsElizabeth Xisto Souto0Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaile1José Eduardo Cajado Moncau2Lígia Niero-Melo3Gisele Wally Braga4Maria Regina Regis Silva5José Kerbauy6Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the score systems of Cassano and Sanz and suggest a new one. DESIGN: Case series. LOCATION: Teaching hospitals: EPM UNIFESP and Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. PARTICIPANTS: 59 patients diagnosed from 1979 to 1992. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of clinical-laboratorial data. MEASUREMENT: Statistical comparison, uni and multivariate analysis and actuarial survival curves. RESULTS: Cassano's system divided the patients into high and low risk (p=0.0966) while, Sanz's gave high, intermediate and low risk (p=0.0108). The univariate analysis showed hemoglobin, WBC count, E/M ratio, liver size and blast percentage in BM as statistically significant. The multivariate analysis showed blast percentage in BM (p=0.004) and Hb (p=0.050) as significant. Our system, considering the multivariate analysis data, divided the patients into high, intermediate and low risk (p=0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: Sanz's system was more functional than Cassano's, while ours showed predictive survival value and ease of use in clinical practice.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801997000500005&lng=en&tlng=enMyelodysplastic syndromesPrognosisSurvival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth Xisto Souto
Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaile
José Eduardo Cajado Moncau
Lígia Niero-Melo
Gisele Wally Braga
Maria Regina Regis Silva
José Kerbauy
spellingShingle Elizabeth Xisto Souto
Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaile
José Eduardo Cajado Moncau
Lígia Niero-Melo
Gisele Wally Braga
Maria Regina Regis Silva
José Kerbauy
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems
São Paulo Medical Journal
Myelodysplastic syndromes
Prognosis
Survival
author_facet Elizabeth Xisto Souto
Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaile
José Eduardo Cajado Moncau
Lígia Niero-Melo
Gisele Wally Braga
Maria Regina Regis Silva
José Kerbauy
author_sort Elizabeth Xisto Souto
title Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems
title_short Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems
title_full Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems
title_fullStr Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems
title_full_unstemmed Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): prognostic factors and scoring systems
title_sort myelodysplastic syndromes (mds): prognostic factors and scoring systems
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina
series São Paulo Medical Journal
issn 1806-9460
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the score systems of Cassano and Sanz and suggest a new one. DESIGN: Case series. LOCATION: Teaching hospitals: EPM UNIFESP and Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. PARTICIPANTS: 59 patients diagnosed from 1979 to 1992. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of clinical-laboratorial data. MEASUREMENT: Statistical comparison, uni and multivariate analysis and actuarial survival curves. RESULTS: Cassano's system divided the patients into high and low risk (p=0.0966) while, Sanz's gave high, intermediate and low risk (p=0.0108). The univariate analysis showed hemoglobin, WBC count, E/M ratio, liver size and blast percentage in BM as statistically significant. The multivariate analysis showed blast percentage in BM (p=0.004) and Hb (p=0.050) as significant. Our system, considering the multivariate analysis data, divided the patients into high, intermediate and low risk (p=0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: Sanz's system was more functional than Cassano's, while ours showed predictive survival value and ease of use in clinical practice.
topic Myelodysplastic syndromes
Prognosis
Survival
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801997000500005&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethxistosouto myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
AT mariadelourdeslopesferrarichauffaile myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
AT joseeduardocajadomoncau myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
AT ligianieromelo myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
AT giselewallybraga myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
AT mariareginaregissilva myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
AT josekerbauy myelodysplasticsyndromesmdsprognosticfactorsandscoringsystems
_version_ 1716784521337110528