The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands

While the European Union aims at developing a common foreign policy and a common arms market, European states still collaborate poorly in the field of actual defence procurement. National firms (each furtively supported by its national government) often compete with each other as much as with Americ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Virginie Mamadouh, Herman van der Wusten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes 2011-10-01
Series:L'Espace Politique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/2124
id doaj-ce05cea86466401ab3493f75f39d0efe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce05cea86466401ab3493f75f39d0efe2020-11-24T23:26:33ZengUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdennesL'Espace Politique1958-55002011-10-011510.4000/espacepolitique.2124The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the NetherlandsVirginie MamadouhHerman van der WustenWhile the European Union aims at developing a common foreign policy and a common arms market, European states still collaborate poorly in the field of actual defence procurement. National firms (each furtively supported by its national government) often compete with each other as much as with American ones, European initiatives compete with Transatlantic ones. At the same time the relations between the European Defence and Security Policy (EDSP) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) remain a much debated issue. While the positions of the larger member states (France, UK and Germany) are well known in this field, the views and practices of the smaller member states are hardly discussed in the literature. This paper explores the geopolitical and geo-economical dimensions of policy making regarding military technology and production in the Netherlands. A neutral country until German invasion and occupation (1940-45), the Netherlands is a founding member of the European Communities and NATO, and a close ally of the US and the UK. Around 2000 it was in absolute terms the sixth spender in the EU regarding both military Research & Development and Equipment Procurement. What are the geopolitical and geo-economical arguments of the Dutch government to procure a new generation of jet fighters and to participate in the Joint Strike Fighter programme to develop and produce the Lockheed Martin-F-35 Lightning II rather than to purchase the French Rafale or the Eurofighter? What does this mean for the further development of the EU as a territorial actor in international affairs?http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/2124The NetherlandsEuropean Unionarms procurementaerospace industryJoint Strike FighterF-35 Lightning II
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Virginie Mamadouh
Herman van der Wusten
spellingShingle Virginie Mamadouh
Herman van der Wusten
The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands
L'Espace Politique
The Netherlands
European Union
arms procurement
aerospace industry
Joint Strike Fighter
F-35 Lightning II
author_facet Virginie Mamadouh
Herman van der Wusten
author_sort Virginie Mamadouh
title The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands
title_short The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands
title_full The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands
title_fullStr The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed The Footprint of the JSF/F-35 Lightning II Military Jet in the Netherlands
title_sort footprint of the jsf/f-35 lightning ii military jet in the netherlands
publisher Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes
series L'Espace Politique
issn 1958-5500
publishDate 2011-10-01
description While the European Union aims at developing a common foreign policy and a common arms market, European states still collaborate poorly in the field of actual defence procurement. National firms (each furtively supported by its national government) often compete with each other as much as with American ones, European initiatives compete with Transatlantic ones. At the same time the relations between the European Defence and Security Policy (EDSP) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) remain a much debated issue. While the positions of the larger member states (France, UK and Germany) are well known in this field, the views and practices of the smaller member states are hardly discussed in the literature. This paper explores the geopolitical and geo-economical dimensions of policy making regarding military technology and production in the Netherlands. A neutral country until German invasion and occupation (1940-45), the Netherlands is a founding member of the European Communities and NATO, and a close ally of the US and the UK. Around 2000 it was in absolute terms the sixth spender in the EU regarding both military Research & Development and Equipment Procurement. What are the geopolitical and geo-economical arguments of the Dutch government to procure a new generation of jet fighters and to participate in the Joint Strike Fighter programme to develop and produce the Lockheed Martin-F-35 Lightning II rather than to purchase the French Rafale or the Eurofighter? What does this mean for the further development of the EU as a territorial actor in international affairs?
topic The Netherlands
European Union
arms procurement
aerospace industry
Joint Strike Fighter
F-35 Lightning II
url http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/2124
work_keys_str_mv AT virginiemamadouh thefootprintofthejsff35lightningiimilitaryjetinthenetherlands
AT hermanvanderwusten thefootprintofthejsff35lightningiimilitaryjetinthenetherlands
AT virginiemamadouh footprintofthejsff35lightningiimilitaryjetinthenetherlands
AT hermanvanderwusten footprintofthejsff35lightningiimilitaryjetinthenetherlands
_version_ 1725554603407179776