Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range

Existing theory for invasive nonnative species emphasizes the role of escaping specialist enemies. A useful approach is to reciprocally transplant enemies in a controlled and common experiment to quantify the interaction specificity of enemies from plant's native and nonnative ranges. Quantitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kurt O. Reinhart, Wim H. Van der Putten, Tom Tytgat, Keith Clay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Ecology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/737298
id doaj-cdfdc9c529a14697a1abf63fe7069140
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdfdc9c529a14697a1abf63fe70691402020-11-25T00:19:11ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Ecology1687-97081687-97162011-01-01201110.1155/2011/737298737298Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative RangeKurt O. Reinhart0Wim H. Van der Putten1Tom Tytgat2Keith Clay3United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Fort Keogh Livestock & Range Research Laboratory, 243 Fort Keogh Road, Miles City, MT, 59301-4016, USANetherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Terrestrial Ecology, Department of Multitrophic Interactions, Boterhoeksestraat 48, 6666 GA Heteren, The NetherlandsDepartment of Ecogenomics, Institute for Water and Wetland Research Radboud, University Nijmegen Huygens, building Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405-3700, USAExisting theory for invasive nonnative species emphasizes the role of escaping specialist enemies. A useful approach is to reciprocally transplant enemies in a controlled and common experiment to quantify the interaction specificity of enemies from plant's native and nonnative ranges. Quantitative measures of interaction specificity, from two experiments with three host genotypes (Belgium, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania) and 37 Pythium isolates (10 Europe and 27 USA), revealed that Pythium pathogens from populations of Prunus serotina in its native range were not host genotype specific while Pythium pathogens from its nonnative range vary with host genotype. This study provides empirical evidence suggesting that Pythium from the nonnative range are either preadapted to or are actively adapting to this host. Although only for a single pathosystem, this study illustrates the importance of understanding enemy impact and host-specificity to assess whether an invader has escaped its natural enemies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/737298
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kurt O. Reinhart
Wim H. Van der Putten
Tom Tytgat
Keith Clay
spellingShingle Kurt O. Reinhart
Wim H. Van der Putten
Tom Tytgat
Keith Clay
Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range
International Journal of Ecology
author_facet Kurt O. Reinhart
Wim H. Van der Putten
Tom Tytgat
Keith Clay
author_sort Kurt O. Reinhart
title Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range
title_short Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range
title_full Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range
title_fullStr Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range
title_full_unstemmed Variation in Specificity of Soil-Borne Pathogens from a Plant's Native Range versus Its Nonnative Range
title_sort variation in specificity of soil-borne pathogens from a plant's native range versus its nonnative range
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Ecology
issn 1687-9708
1687-9716
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Existing theory for invasive nonnative species emphasizes the role of escaping specialist enemies. A useful approach is to reciprocally transplant enemies in a controlled and common experiment to quantify the interaction specificity of enemies from plant's native and nonnative ranges. Quantitative measures of interaction specificity, from two experiments with three host genotypes (Belgium, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania) and 37 Pythium isolates (10 Europe and 27 USA), revealed that Pythium pathogens from populations of Prunus serotina in its native range were not host genotype specific while Pythium pathogens from its nonnative range vary with host genotype. This study provides empirical evidence suggesting that Pythium from the nonnative range are either preadapted to or are actively adapting to this host. Although only for a single pathosystem, this study illustrates the importance of understanding enemy impact and host-specificity to assess whether an invader has escaped its natural enemies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/737298
work_keys_str_mv AT kurtoreinhart variationinspecificityofsoilbornepathogensfromaplantsnativerangeversusitsnonnativerange
AT wimhvanderputten variationinspecificityofsoilbornepathogensfromaplantsnativerangeversusitsnonnativerange
AT tomtytgat variationinspecificityofsoilbornepathogensfromaplantsnativerangeversusitsnonnativerange
AT keithclay variationinspecificityofsoilbornepathogensfromaplantsnativerangeversusitsnonnativerange
_version_ 1725372811800739840