The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
Recently we have witnessed the worldwide adoption of many different types of innovative technologies, such as crowdsourcing, ridesharing, open and big data, aiming at delivering public services more efficiently and effectively. Among them, ridesharing has received substantial attention from decision...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1277 |
id |
doaj-cdf101ac585741519544252578c9b14f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cdf101ac585741519544252578c9b14f2020-11-24T21:01:34ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-05-01115127710.3390/en11051277en11051277The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from SingaporeYanwei Li0Araz Taeihagh1Martin de Jong2Department of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, ChinaLee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469B Bukit Timah Road, Li Ka Shing Building, Singapore 259771, SingaporeFaculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The NetherlandsRecently we have witnessed the worldwide adoption of many different types of innovative technologies, such as crowdsourcing, ridesharing, open and big data, aiming at delivering public services more efficiently and effectively. Among them, ridesharing has received substantial attention from decision-makers around the world. Because of the multitude of currently understood or potentially unknown risks associated with ridesharing (unemployment, insurance, information privacy, and environmental risk), governments in different countries apply different strategies to address such risks. Some governments prohibit the adoption of ridesharing altogether, while other governments promote it. In this article, we address the question of how risks involved in ridesharing are governed over time. We present an in-depth single case study on Singapore and examine how the Singaporean government has addressed risks in ridesharing over time. The Singaporean government has a strong ambition to become an innovation hub, and many innovative technologies have been adopted and promoted to that end. At the same time, decision-makers in Singapore are reputed for their proactive style of social governance. The example of Singapore can be regarded as a revelatory case study, helping us further to explore governance practices in other countries.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1277riskridesharingtransportgovernanceinnovative technologiescase studySingapore |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yanwei Li Araz Taeihagh Martin de Jong |
spellingShingle |
Yanwei Li Araz Taeihagh Martin de Jong The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore Energies risk ridesharing transport governance innovative technologies case study Singapore |
author_facet |
Yanwei Li Araz Taeihagh Martin de Jong |
author_sort |
Yanwei Li |
title |
The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore |
title_short |
The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore |
title_full |
The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore |
title_fullStr |
The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore |
title_sort |
governance of risks in ridesharing: a revelatory case from singapore |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
Recently we have witnessed the worldwide adoption of many different types of innovative technologies, such as crowdsourcing, ridesharing, open and big data, aiming at delivering public services more efficiently and effectively. Among them, ridesharing has received substantial attention from decision-makers around the world. Because of the multitude of currently understood or potentially unknown risks associated with ridesharing (unemployment, insurance, information privacy, and environmental risk), governments in different countries apply different strategies to address such risks. Some governments prohibit the adoption of ridesharing altogether, while other governments promote it. In this article, we address the question of how risks involved in ridesharing are governed over time. We present an in-depth single case study on Singapore and examine how the Singaporean government has addressed risks in ridesharing over time. The Singaporean government has a strong ambition to become an innovation hub, and many innovative technologies have been adopted and promoted to that end. At the same time, decision-makers in Singapore are reputed for their proactive style of social governance. The example of Singapore can be regarded as a revelatory case study, helping us further to explore governance practices in other countries. |
topic |
risk ridesharing transport governance innovative technologies case study Singapore |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1277 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanweili thegovernanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore AT araztaeihagh thegovernanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore AT martindejong thegovernanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore AT yanweili governanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore AT araztaeihagh governanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore AT martindejong governanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore |
_version_ |
1716777565672177664 |