The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore

Recently we have witnessed the worldwide adoption of many different types of innovative technologies, such as crowdsourcing, ridesharing, open and big data, aiming at delivering public services more efficiently and effectively. Among them, ridesharing has received substantial attention from decision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanwei Li, Araz Taeihagh, Martin de Jong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1277
id doaj-cdf101ac585741519544252578c9b14f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdf101ac585741519544252578c9b14f2020-11-24T21:01:34ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-05-01115127710.3390/en11051277en11051277The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from SingaporeYanwei Li0Araz Taeihagh1Martin de Jong2Department of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, ChinaLee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469B Bukit Timah Road, Li Ka Shing Building, Singapore 259771, SingaporeFaculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The NetherlandsRecently we have witnessed the worldwide adoption of many different types of innovative technologies, such as crowdsourcing, ridesharing, open and big data, aiming at delivering public services more efficiently and effectively. Among them, ridesharing has received substantial attention from decision-makers around the world. Because of the multitude of currently understood or potentially unknown risks associated with ridesharing (unemployment, insurance, information privacy, and environmental risk), governments in different countries apply different strategies to address such risks. Some governments prohibit the adoption of ridesharing altogether, while other governments promote it. In this article, we address the question of how risks involved in ridesharing are governed over time. We present an in-depth single case study on Singapore and examine how the Singaporean government has addressed risks in ridesharing over time. The Singaporean government has a strong ambition to become an innovation hub, and many innovative technologies have been adopted and promoted to that end. At the same time, decision-makers in Singapore are reputed for their proactive style of social governance. The example of Singapore can be regarded as a revelatory case study, helping us further to explore governance practices in other countries.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1277riskridesharingtransportgovernanceinnovative technologiescase studySingapore
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yanwei Li
Araz Taeihagh
Martin de Jong
spellingShingle Yanwei Li
Araz Taeihagh
Martin de Jong
The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
Energies
risk
ridesharing
transport
governance
innovative technologies
case study
Singapore
author_facet Yanwei Li
Araz Taeihagh
Martin de Jong
author_sort Yanwei Li
title The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
title_short The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
title_full The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
title_fullStr The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
title_full_unstemmed The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore
title_sort governance of risks in ridesharing: a revelatory case from singapore
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Recently we have witnessed the worldwide adoption of many different types of innovative technologies, such as crowdsourcing, ridesharing, open and big data, aiming at delivering public services more efficiently and effectively. Among them, ridesharing has received substantial attention from decision-makers around the world. Because of the multitude of currently understood or potentially unknown risks associated with ridesharing (unemployment, insurance, information privacy, and environmental risk), governments in different countries apply different strategies to address such risks. Some governments prohibit the adoption of ridesharing altogether, while other governments promote it. In this article, we address the question of how risks involved in ridesharing are governed over time. We present an in-depth single case study on Singapore and examine how the Singaporean government has addressed risks in ridesharing over time. The Singaporean government has a strong ambition to become an innovation hub, and many innovative technologies have been adopted and promoted to that end. At the same time, decision-makers in Singapore are reputed for their proactive style of social governance. The example of Singapore can be regarded as a revelatory case study, helping us further to explore governance practices in other countries.
topic risk
ridesharing
transport
governance
innovative technologies
case study
Singapore
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1277
work_keys_str_mv AT yanweili thegovernanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore
AT araztaeihagh thegovernanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore
AT martindejong thegovernanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore
AT yanweili governanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore
AT araztaeihagh governanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore
AT martindejong governanceofrisksinridesharingarevelatorycasefromsingapore
_version_ 1716777565672177664