Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study

Background: The risk of thromboembolic events is increased in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment. The risk of bleeding events is increased if these patients are treated with anticoagulants and further increased in those with active cancer. Methods: RELOAD, a r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hendrik Bonnemeier, Maria Huelsebeck, Sebastian Kloss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-06-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906718301702
id doaj-cded81d66ec4459f8dbc3d8654fd8ea0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cded81d66ec4459f8dbc3d8654fd8ea02020-11-24T21:34:38ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature2352-90672019-06-0123Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort studyHendrik Bonnemeier0Maria Huelsebeck1Sebastian Kloss2Department of Electrophysiology and Rhythmology, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, GermanyBayer AG, Berlin, Germany; Corresponding author at: Bayer AG, Muellerstraße 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.Bayer AG, Berlin, GermanyBackground: The risk of thromboembolic events is increased in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment. The risk of bleeding events is increased if these patients are treated with anticoagulants and further increased in those with active cancer. Methods: RELOAD, a retrospective database study, assessed the outcomes of patients with NVAF prescribed rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon. Here, we present a subgroup analysis evaluating effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon in patients with NVAF and renal impairment. Analyses were additionally stratified by patients with and without evidence of cancer at baseline. Results: When using the ‘one tablet per day’ definition of estimating drug exposure time, the incidence of the primary endpoint of ischaemic stroke was significantly lower in patients (without evidence of cancer at baseline) receiving rivaroxaban 15 mg or 20 mg once daily versus those receiving phenprocoumon (2.40 vs 3.51 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.94, p = 0.015); with the incidence of the primary safety outcome of intracranial haemorrhage being numerically lower (0.57 vs 0.89 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.14, p = 0.14). Similar results were observed when using the ‘empirical defined daily dose’ definition to estimate drug exposure time and when including patients with evidence of cancer. Conclusion: The prescription of rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and renal impairment was associated with a lower incidence of ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage versus phenprocoumon in patients without evidence of cancer. Keywords: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation, Phenprocoumon, RELOAD study, Renal impairment, Rivaroxabanhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906718301702
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hendrik Bonnemeier
Maria Huelsebeck
Sebastian Kloss
spellingShingle Hendrik Bonnemeier
Maria Huelsebeck
Sebastian Kloss
Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study
International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
author_facet Hendrik Bonnemeier
Maria Huelsebeck
Sebastian Kloss
author_sort Hendrik Bonnemeier
title Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin k antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in germany — a retrospective cohort study
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
issn 2352-9067
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background: The risk of thromboembolic events is increased in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment. The risk of bleeding events is increased if these patients are treated with anticoagulants and further increased in those with active cancer. Methods: RELOAD, a retrospective database study, assessed the outcomes of patients with NVAF prescribed rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon. Here, we present a subgroup analysis evaluating effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon in patients with NVAF and renal impairment. Analyses were additionally stratified by patients with and without evidence of cancer at baseline. Results: When using the ‘one tablet per day’ definition of estimating drug exposure time, the incidence of the primary endpoint of ischaemic stroke was significantly lower in patients (without evidence of cancer at baseline) receiving rivaroxaban 15 mg or 20 mg once daily versus those receiving phenprocoumon (2.40 vs 3.51 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.94, p = 0.015); with the incidence of the primary safety outcome of intracranial haemorrhage being numerically lower (0.57 vs 0.89 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.14, p = 0.14). Similar results were observed when using the ‘empirical defined daily dose’ definition to estimate drug exposure time and when including patients with evidence of cancer. Conclusion: The prescription of rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and renal impairment was associated with a lower incidence of ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage versus phenprocoumon in patients without evidence of cancer. Keywords: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation, Phenprocoumon, RELOAD study, Renal impairment, Rivaroxaban
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906718301702
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrikbonnemeier comparativeeffectivenessofrivaroxabanversusavitaminkantagonistinpatientswithrenalimpairmenttreatedfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationingermanyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mariahuelsebeck comparativeeffectivenessofrivaroxabanversusavitaminkantagonistinpatientswithrenalimpairmenttreatedfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationingermanyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sebastiankloss comparativeeffectivenessofrivaroxabanversusavitaminkantagonistinpatientswithrenalimpairmenttreatedfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationingermanyaretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1725948445835919360