X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays

All too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul A. Oakley, Deed E. Harrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-09-01
Series:Dose-Response
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820959542
id doaj-cddc75b62324497d801227d61251df2e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cddc75b62324497d801227d61251df2e2020-11-25T03:23:11ZengSAGE PublishingDose-Response1559-32582020-09-011810.1177/1559325820959542X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-raysPaul A. Oakley0Deed E. Harrison1 Private Practice, Newmarket, ON Canada CBP Non Profit, Inc., Eagle, ID, USAAll too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the effects of low-dose radiation exposures. Themes of X-ray hesitancy come in 3 forms: 1. All radiation exposures are harmful (i.e. carcinogenic); 2. Radiation exposures are cumulative; 3. Children are more susceptible to radiation. Herein we address these concerns and find that low-dose radiation activates the body’s adaptive responses and leads to reduced cancers. Low-dose radiation is not cumulative as long as enough time (e.g. 24 hrs) passes prior to a repeated exposure, and any damage is repaired, removed, or eliminated. Children have more active immune systems; the literature shows children are no more affected than adults by radiation exposures. Medical X-rays present a small, insignificant addition to background radiation exposure that is not likely to cause harm. Doctors and patients alike should be better informed of the lack of risks from diagnostic radiation and the decision to image should rely on the best evidence, unique needs of the patient, and the expertise of the physician—not radiophobia.https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820959542
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul A. Oakley
Deed E. Harrison
spellingShingle Paul A. Oakley
Deed E. Harrison
X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
Dose-Response
author_facet Paul A. Oakley
Deed E. Harrison
author_sort Paul A. Oakley
title X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_short X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_full X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_fullStr X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_full_unstemmed X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_sort x-ray hesitancy: patients’ radiophobic concerns over medical x-rays
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Dose-Response
issn 1559-3258
publishDate 2020-09-01
description All too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the effects of low-dose radiation exposures. Themes of X-ray hesitancy come in 3 forms: 1. All radiation exposures are harmful (i.e. carcinogenic); 2. Radiation exposures are cumulative; 3. Children are more susceptible to radiation. Herein we address these concerns and find that low-dose radiation activates the body’s adaptive responses and leads to reduced cancers. Low-dose radiation is not cumulative as long as enough time (e.g. 24 hrs) passes prior to a repeated exposure, and any damage is repaired, removed, or eliminated. Children have more active immune systems; the literature shows children are no more affected than adults by radiation exposures. Medical X-rays present a small, insignificant addition to background radiation exposure that is not likely to cause harm. Doctors and patients alike should be better informed of the lack of risks from diagnostic radiation and the decision to image should rely on the best evidence, unique needs of the patient, and the expertise of the physician—not radiophobia.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820959542
work_keys_str_mv AT paulaoakley xrayhesitancypatientsradiophobicconcernsovermedicalxrays
AT deedeharrison xrayhesitancypatientsradiophobicconcernsovermedicalxrays
_version_ 1724607019135008768