Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.

The effects of High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on body composition and the relationship of the latter with performance are not well defined. In this work we investigated, by means of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, the relative proportions of fat-, lean soft tissue-, and mineral mass in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valentina Cavedon, Chiara Milanese, Alessandro Marchi, Carlo Zancanaro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237887
id doaj-cdd57399c57f439498212952e2b5e19b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdd57399c57f439498212952e2b5e19b2021-03-03T22:02:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01158e023788710.1371/journal.pone.0237887Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.Valentina CavedonChiara MilaneseAlessandro MarchiCarlo ZancanaroThe effects of High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on body composition and the relationship of the latter with performance are not well defined. In this work we investigated, by means of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, the relative proportions of fat-, lean soft tissue-, and mineral mass in CrossFit® (CF, a popular mode of HIFT) participants (n = 24; age, 28.2 ± 3.39 y; BMI, 25.3 ± 2.04 kg/m2) with at least 1 year of CF training experience and weekly amount of training > 10 h/w (n = 13; Higher Training, HT) or < 10 h/w (n = 11; Lower Training, LT) as well as age- matched and BMI-matched physically active controls (CHT, CLT). Performance was assessed in the "Fran" workout. Data were analyzed by one-way or repeated measures ANOVA where needed. Association between variables was assessed with the Pearson's correlation coefficient r. Partial correlation was used where needed. Results showed that HT performed better than LT in the "Fran" (P < 0.001) and they had higher whole-body bone mineral density (P = 0.026) and higher lean soft mass (P = 0.002), and borderline lower percent fat mass (P = 0.050). The main difference between CF participants (HT, LT) and their respective controls (CHT, CLT) was a lower adiposity in the former. In CF participants, performance positively correlated with appendicular lean soft tissue mass (P = 0.030). It can be concluded that, in CF participants, a higher amount of weekly training improves most notably lean body mass and increases performance in association with increased skeletal muscle mass. CF participation is especially effective in reducing fat mass vs. age- and BMI-matched physically active controls.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237887
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valentina Cavedon
Chiara Milanese
Alessandro Marchi
Carlo Zancanaro
spellingShingle Valentina Cavedon
Chiara Milanese
Alessandro Marchi
Carlo Zancanaro
Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Valentina Cavedon
Chiara Milanese
Alessandro Marchi
Carlo Zancanaro
author_sort Valentina Cavedon
title Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
title_short Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
title_full Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
title_fullStr Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
title_full_unstemmed Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
title_sort different amount of training affects body composition and performance in high-intensity functional training participants.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The effects of High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on body composition and the relationship of the latter with performance are not well defined. In this work we investigated, by means of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, the relative proportions of fat-, lean soft tissue-, and mineral mass in CrossFit® (CF, a popular mode of HIFT) participants (n = 24; age, 28.2 ± 3.39 y; BMI, 25.3 ± 2.04 kg/m2) with at least 1 year of CF training experience and weekly amount of training > 10 h/w (n = 13; Higher Training, HT) or < 10 h/w (n = 11; Lower Training, LT) as well as age- matched and BMI-matched physically active controls (CHT, CLT). Performance was assessed in the "Fran" workout. Data were analyzed by one-way or repeated measures ANOVA where needed. Association between variables was assessed with the Pearson's correlation coefficient r. Partial correlation was used where needed. Results showed that HT performed better than LT in the "Fran" (P < 0.001) and they had higher whole-body bone mineral density (P = 0.026) and higher lean soft mass (P = 0.002), and borderline lower percent fat mass (P = 0.050). The main difference between CF participants (HT, LT) and their respective controls (CHT, CLT) was a lower adiposity in the former. In CF participants, performance positively correlated with appendicular lean soft tissue mass (P = 0.030). It can be concluded that, in CF participants, a higher amount of weekly training improves most notably lean body mass and increases performance in association with increased skeletal muscle mass. CF participation is especially effective in reducing fat mass vs. age- and BMI-matched physically active controls.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237887
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinacavedon differentamountoftrainingaffectsbodycompositionandperformanceinhighintensityfunctionaltrainingparticipants
AT chiaramilanese differentamountoftrainingaffectsbodycompositionandperformanceinhighintensityfunctionaltrainingparticipants
AT alessandromarchi differentamountoftrainingaffectsbodycompositionandperformanceinhighintensityfunctionaltrainingparticipants
AT carlozancanaro differentamountoftrainingaffectsbodycompositionandperformanceinhighintensityfunctionaltrainingparticipants
_version_ 1714813766197051392