Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program

Objectives: To evaluate the concordance between self-reported data and variables obtained from Medicare administrative data in terms of chronic conditions and health care utilization. Design: Retrospective observational study. Participants: We analyzed data from a sample of Medicare beneficiaries wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luohua eJiang, Ben eZhang, Matthew Lee eSmith, Andrea eLorden, Tiffany eRadcliff, Kate eLorig, Benjamin Lee Howell, Marcia G Ory
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00222/full
id doaj-cdcb15e3cad4414ca5c4280cb27ae67a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdcb15e3cad4414ca5c4280cb27ae67a2020-11-24T20:59:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652015-10-01310.3389/fpubh.2015.00222155494Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management ProgramLuohua eJiang0Ben eZhang1Matthew Lee eSmith2Andrea eLorden3Tiffany eRadcliff4Kate eLorig5Benjamin Lee Howell6Marcia G Ory7University of California IrvineTexas A&M Health Science CenterUniversity of GeorgiaTexas A&M Health Science CenterTexas A&M Health Science CenterStanford UniversityCenters for Medicare and MedicaidTexas A&M Health Science CenterObjectives: To evaluate the concordance between self-reported data and variables obtained from Medicare administrative data in terms of chronic conditions and health care utilization. Design: Retrospective observational study. Participants: We analyzed data from a sample of Medicare beneficiaries who were part of the National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) and were eligible for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) pilot evaluation of CDSMP (n = 119). Methods: Self-reported and Medicare claims-based chronic conditions and health care utilization were examined. Percent of consistent numbers, kappa statistics (κ), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to evaluate concordance. Results: The two data sources had substantial agreement for diabetes and COPD (κ = 0.75 and κ = 0.60, respectively), moderate agreement for cancer and heart disease (κ = 0.50 and κ = 0.47, respectively), and fair agreement for depression (κ = 0.26). With respect to health care utilization, the two data sources had almost perfect or substantial concordance for number of hospitalizations (κ: 0.69 – 0.79), moderate concordance for ED care utilization (κ: 0.45 – 0.61), and generally low agreement for number of physician visits (κ ≤ 0.31). Conclusions: Either self-reports or claim-based administrative data for diabetes, COPD, and hospitalizations can be used to analyze Medicare beneficiaries in the U.S. Yet, caution must be taken when only one data source is available for other types of chronic conditions and health care utilization.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00222/fullAgingChronic DiseaseHealth ServicesDisease Managementclaims data
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luohua eJiang
Ben eZhang
Matthew Lee eSmith
Andrea eLorden
Tiffany eRadcliff
Kate eLorig
Benjamin Lee Howell
Marcia G Ory
spellingShingle Luohua eJiang
Ben eZhang
Matthew Lee eSmith
Andrea eLorden
Tiffany eRadcliff
Kate eLorig
Benjamin Lee Howell
Marcia G Ory
Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
Frontiers in Public Health
Aging
Chronic Disease
Health Services
Disease Management
claims data
author_facet Luohua eJiang
Ben eZhang
Matthew Lee eSmith
Andrea eLorden
Tiffany eRadcliff
Kate eLorig
Benjamin Lee Howell
Marcia G Ory
author_sort Luohua eJiang
title Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
title_short Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
title_full Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
title_fullStr Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
title_full_unstemmed Concordance between Self-Reports and Medicare Claims among Participants in a National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
title_sort concordance between self-reports and medicare claims among participants in a national study of chronic disease self-management program
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Public Health
issn 2296-2565
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Objectives: To evaluate the concordance between self-reported data and variables obtained from Medicare administrative data in terms of chronic conditions and health care utilization. Design: Retrospective observational study. Participants: We analyzed data from a sample of Medicare beneficiaries who were part of the National Study of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) and were eligible for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) pilot evaluation of CDSMP (n = 119). Methods: Self-reported and Medicare claims-based chronic conditions and health care utilization were examined. Percent of consistent numbers, kappa statistics (κ), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to evaluate concordance. Results: The two data sources had substantial agreement for diabetes and COPD (κ = 0.75 and κ = 0.60, respectively), moderate agreement for cancer and heart disease (κ = 0.50 and κ = 0.47, respectively), and fair agreement for depression (κ = 0.26). With respect to health care utilization, the two data sources had almost perfect or substantial concordance for number of hospitalizations (κ: 0.69 – 0.79), moderate concordance for ED care utilization (κ: 0.45 – 0.61), and generally low agreement for number of physician visits (κ ≤ 0.31). Conclusions: Either self-reports or claim-based administrative data for diabetes, COPD, and hospitalizations can be used to analyze Medicare beneficiaries in the U.S. Yet, caution must be taken when only one data source is available for other types of chronic conditions and health care utilization.
topic Aging
Chronic Disease
Health Services
Disease Management
claims data
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00222/full
work_keys_str_mv AT luohuaejiang concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT benezhang concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT matthewleeesmith concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT andreaelorden concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT tiffanyeradcliff concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT kateelorig concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT benjaminleehowell concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
AT marciagory concordancebetweenselfreportsandmedicareclaimsamongparticipantsinanationalstudyofchronicdiseaseselfmanagementprogram
_version_ 1716783389979181056