A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music
The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of human listeners against the selected machine learning algorithms in the task of the classification of spatial audio scenes in binaural recordings of music under practical conditions. The three scenes were subject to classification: (1) music...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/17/5956 |
id |
doaj-cda656af25ec493986c6f7c87a64aaf3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cda656af25ec493986c6f7c87a64aaf32020-11-25T03:41:38ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-08-01105956595610.3390/app10175956A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of MusicSławomir K. Zieliński0Hyunkook Lee1Paweł Antoniuk2Oskar Dadan3Faculty of Computer Science, Białystok University of Technology, 15-351 Białystok, PolandApplied Psychoacoustics Laboratory (APL), University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UKFaculty of Computer Science, Białystok University of Technology, 15-351 Białystok, PolandFaculty of Computer Science, Białystok University of Technology, 15-351 Białystok, PolandThe purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of human listeners against the selected machine learning algorithms in the task of the classification of spatial audio scenes in binaural recordings of music under practical conditions. The three scenes were subject to classification: (1) music ensemble (a group of musical sources) located in the front, (2) music ensemble located at the back, and (3) music ensemble distributed around a listener. In the listening test, undertaken remotely over the Internet, human listeners reached the classification accuracy of 42.5%. For the listeners who passed the post-screening test, the accuracy was greater, approaching 60%. The above classification task was also undertaken automatically using four machine learning algorithms: convolutional neural network, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting framework, and logistic regression. The machine learning algorithms substantially outperformed human listeners, with the classification accuracy reaching 84%, when tested under the binaural-room-impulse-response (BRIR) matched conditions. However, when the algorithms were tested under the BRIR mismatched scenario, the accuracy obtained by the algorithms was comparable to that exhibited by the listeners who passed the post-screening test, implying that the machine learning algorithms capability to perform in unknown electro-acoustic conditions needs to be further improved.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/17/5956spatial audio scene classificationspatial audio information retrievalconvolutional neural networksdeep learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sławomir K. Zieliński Hyunkook Lee Paweł Antoniuk Oskar Dadan |
spellingShingle |
Sławomir K. Zieliński Hyunkook Lee Paweł Antoniuk Oskar Dadan A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music Applied Sciences spatial audio scene classification spatial audio information retrieval convolutional neural networks deep learning |
author_facet |
Sławomir K. Zieliński Hyunkook Lee Paweł Antoniuk Oskar Dadan |
author_sort |
Sławomir K. Zieliński |
title |
A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music |
title_short |
A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music |
title_full |
A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Human against Machine-Classification of Spatial Audio Scenes in Binaural Recordings of Music |
title_sort |
comparison of human against machine-classification of spatial audio scenes in binaural recordings of music |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of human listeners against the selected machine learning algorithms in the task of the classification of spatial audio scenes in binaural recordings of music under practical conditions. The three scenes were subject to classification: (1) music ensemble (a group of musical sources) located in the front, (2) music ensemble located at the back, and (3) music ensemble distributed around a listener. In the listening test, undertaken remotely over the Internet, human listeners reached the classification accuracy of 42.5%. For the listeners who passed the post-screening test, the accuracy was greater, approaching 60%. The above classification task was also undertaken automatically using four machine learning algorithms: convolutional neural network, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting framework, and logistic regression. The machine learning algorithms substantially outperformed human listeners, with the classification accuracy reaching 84%, when tested under the binaural-room-impulse-response (BRIR) matched conditions. However, when the algorithms were tested under the BRIR mismatched scenario, the accuracy obtained by the algorithms was comparable to that exhibited by the listeners who passed the post-screening test, implying that the machine learning algorithms capability to perform in unknown electro-acoustic conditions needs to be further improved. |
topic |
spatial audio scene classification spatial audio information retrieval convolutional neural networks deep learning |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/17/5956 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sławomirkzielinski acomparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT hyunkooklee acomparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT pawełantoniuk acomparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT oskardadan acomparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT sławomirkzielinski comparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT hyunkooklee comparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT pawełantoniuk comparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic AT oskardadan comparisonofhumanagainstmachineclassificationofspatialaudioscenesinbinauralrecordingsofmusic |
_version_ |
1724529105467080704 |