Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012

This paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Ulmanen, Åsa Gerger Swartling, Oskar Wallgren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-03-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/3/708
id doaj-cd9f3053c05049d38ccc48c01a1b48bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd9f3053c05049d38ccc48c01a1b48bb2020-11-25T00:28:32ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072015-03-016370873310.3390/f6030708f6030708Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012Johanna Ulmanen0Åsa Gerger Swartling1Oskar Wallgren2SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Eklandagatan 86, Göteborg SE-412 61, SwedenStockholm Environment Institute, Box 24218, Stockholm SE-104 51, SwedenWSP Sverige AB, Arenavägen 7, Stockholm-Globen SE-121 88, SwedenThis paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze how the adaptation debate in the forestry sector evolved over the period; who the main advocates for and against adaptation were; and which main arguments and processes affected the debate and policy. The results show that academics advocating climate change adaptation, aided by outside influences, such as political pressure for adaptation responses and the negative impacts of the 2005 storm Gudrun, contributed to an increased general awareness and understanding of adaptation issues amongst forestry stakeholders. Nonetheless, the strong dominance of actors arguing for increased forest production and the limited number and relatively poor organization of adaptation advocates have acted as barriers to mainstreaming adaptation concerns into forestry policy and practice. The dominant coalitions and their values have also determined the direction of debate and policy. The main conclusions for policymakers aiming to further this integration process are the importance of stimulating adaptation coalitions and the value of creating arenas for multiple stakeholder learning about adaptation.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/3/708climate change adaptationforestryforest policypolicy processSweden
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johanna Ulmanen
Åsa Gerger Swartling
Oskar Wallgren
spellingShingle Johanna Ulmanen
Åsa Gerger Swartling
Oskar Wallgren
Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
Forests
climate change adaptation
forestry
forest policy
policy process
Sweden
author_facet Johanna Ulmanen
Åsa Gerger Swartling
Oskar Wallgren
author_sort Johanna Ulmanen
title Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
title_short Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
title_full Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
title_fullStr Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
title_full_unstemmed Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
title_sort climate adaptation in swedish forestry: exploring the debate and policy process, 1990–2012
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze how the adaptation debate in the forestry sector evolved over the period; who the main advocates for and against adaptation were; and which main arguments and processes affected the debate and policy. The results show that academics advocating climate change adaptation, aided by outside influences, such as political pressure for adaptation responses and the negative impacts of the 2005 storm Gudrun, contributed to an increased general awareness and understanding of adaptation issues amongst forestry stakeholders. Nonetheless, the strong dominance of actors arguing for increased forest production and the limited number and relatively poor organization of adaptation advocates have acted as barriers to mainstreaming adaptation concerns into forestry policy and practice. The dominant coalitions and their values have also determined the direction of debate and policy. The main conclusions for policymakers aiming to further this integration process are the importance of stimulating adaptation coalitions and the value of creating arenas for multiple stakeholder learning about adaptation.
topic climate change adaptation
forestry
forest policy
policy process
Sweden
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/3/708
work_keys_str_mv AT johannaulmanen climateadaptationinswedishforestryexploringthedebateandpolicyprocess19902012
AT asagergerswartling climateadaptationinswedishforestryexploringthedebateandpolicyprocess19902012
AT oskarwallgren climateadaptationinswedishforestryexploringthedebateandpolicyprocess19902012
_version_ 1725335570355322880