Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012
This paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze h...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Forests |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/3/708 |
id |
doaj-cd9f3053c05049d38ccc48c01a1b48bb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cd9f3053c05049d38ccc48c01a1b48bb2020-11-25T00:28:32ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072015-03-016370873310.3390/f6030708f6030708Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012Johanna Ulmanen0Åsa Gerger Swartling1Oskar Wallgren2SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Eklandagatan 86, Göteborg SE-412 61, SwedenStockholm Environment Institute, Box 24218, Stockholm SE-104 51, SwedenWSP Sverige AB, Arenavägen 7, Stockholm-Globen SE-121 88, SwedenThis paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze how the adaptation debate in the forestry sector evolved over the period; who the main advocates for and against adaptation were; and which main arguments and processes affected the debate and policy. The results show that academics advocating climate change adaptation, aided by outside influences, such as political pressure for adaptation responses and the negative impacts of the 2005 storm Gudrun, contributed to an increased general awareness and understanding of adaptation issues amongst forestry stakeholders. Nonetheless, the strong dominance of actors arguing for increased forest production and the limited number and relatively poor organization of adaptation advocates have acted as barriers to mainstreaming adaptation concerns into forestry policy and practice. The dominant coalitions and their values have also determined the direction of debate and policy. The main conclusions for policymakers aiming to further this integration process are the importance of stimulating adaptation coalitions and the value of creating arenas for multiple stakeholder learning about adaptation.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/3/708climate change adaptationforestryforest policypolicy processSweden |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Johanna Ulmanen Åsa Gerger Swartling Oskar Wallgren |
spellingShingle |
Johanna Ulmanen Åsa Gerger Swartling Oskar Wallgren Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012 Forests climate change adaptation forestry forest policy policy process Sweden |
author_facet |
Johanna Ulmanen Åsa Gerger Swartling Oskar Wallgren |
author_sort |
Johanna Ulmanen |
title |
Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012 |
title_short |
Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012 |
title_full |
Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012 |
title_fullStr |
Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012 |
title_sort |
climate adaptation in swedish forestry: exploring the debate and policy process, 1990–2012 |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Forests |
issn |
1999-4907 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
This paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze how the adaptation debate in the forestry sector evolved over the period; who the main advocates for and against adaptation were; and which main arguments and processes affected the debate and policy. The results show that academics advocating climate change adaptation, aided by outside influences, such as political pressure for adaptation responses and the negative impacts of the 2005 storm Gudrun, contributed to an increased general awareness and understanding of adaptation issues amongst forestry stakeholders. Nonetheless, the strong dominance of actors arguing for increased forest production and the limited number and relatively poor organization of adaptation advocates have acted as barriers to mainstreaming adaptation concerns into forestry policy and practice. The dominant coalitions and their values have also determined the direction of debate and policy. The main conclusions for policymakers aiming to further this integration process are the importance of stimulating adaptation coalitions and the value of creating arenas for multiple stakeholder learning about adaptation. |
topic |
climate change adaptation forestry forest policy policy process Sweden |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/3/708 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johannaulmanen climateadaptationinswedishforestryexploringthedebateandpolicyprocess19902012 AT asagergerswartling climateadaptationinswedishforestryexploringthedebateandpolicyprocess19902012 AT oskarwallgren climateadaptationinswedishforestryexploringthedebateandpolicyprocess19902012 |
_version_ |
1725335570355322880 |