Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation
This study investigates learners’ implicit knowledge of Voice Onset Time (VOT), a non-distinctive phonetic difference between German and French. Previous studies on VOT in speech produced by English native speakers learning Spanish (Flege & Hammond 1982) and L1 Spanish-speaking learners of Engli...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2017-01-01
|
Series: | SHS Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800010 |
id |
doaj-cd99a9c2381549eeb2133ac63dfedb2d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cd99a9c2381549eeb2133ac63dfedb2d2021-02-02T05:39:41ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242017-01-01380001010.1051/shsconf/20173800010shsconf_couls2016_00010Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitationFalkert AnikaThis study investigates learners’ implicit knowledge of Voice Onset Time (VOT), a non-distinctive phonetic difference between German and French. Previous studies on VOT in speech produced by English native speakers learning Spanish (Flege & Hammond 1982) and L1 Spanish-speaking learners of English (Mora et al. 2014) suggest that learners modify their native VOT patterns when attempting to imitate a foreign accent. This was taken as evidence for the development of tacit awareness of cross-language VOT difference between L1 and L2 voiceless stops. In order to determine if similar modifications occur in the productions of German speaking learners of French as a foreign language, we assessed learners’ speech through VOT duration measures in word-initial /p,t,k/. Data was collected through a reading-aloud elicitation task. Results provide support for the hypothesis that German native speakers are able to modify VOT duration when mimicking a French accent. Given these findings, we believe that accent imitation tasks could be used in L2 phonology instruction to raise learners’ awareness of non-distinctive phonetic differences.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800010 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Falkert Anika |
spellingShingle |
Falkert Anika Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation SHS Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Falkert Anika |
author_sort |
Falkert Anika |
title |
Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation |
title_short |
Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation |
title_full |
Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation |
title_fullStr |
Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation |
title_sort |
assessing implicit phonological knowledge through accent imitation |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
SHS Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-2424 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
This study investigates learners’ implicit knowledge of Voice Onset Time (VOT), a non-distinctive phonetic difference between German and French. Previous studies on VOT in speech produced by English native speakers learning Spanish (Flege & Hammond 1982) and L1 Spanish-speaking learners of English (Mora et al. 2014) suggest that learners modify their native VOT patterns when attempting to imitate a foreign accent. This was taken as evidence for the development of tacit awareness of cross-language VOT difference between L1 and L2 voiceless stops. In order to determine if similar modifications occur in the productions of German speaking learners of French as a foreign language, we assessed learners’ speech through VOT duration measures in word-initial /p,t,k/. Data was collected through a reading-aloud elicitation task. Results provide support for the hypothesis that German native speakers are able to modify VOT duration when mimicking a French accent. Given these findings, we believe that accent imitation tasks could be used in L2 phonology instruction to raise learners’ awareness of non-distinctive phonetic differences. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT falkertanika assessingimplicitphonologicalknowledgethroughaccentimitation |
_version_ |
1724303095731585024 |