Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?

This article reflects upon the question of whether the offence of blasphemy is valid in terms of the Constitution of the Republic which guarantees equal protection and freedom of religion, opinion, conscience and belie! Blasphemy protects only the Christian and Judaic perceptions of God. Would a Mus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kobus van Rooyen
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 1995-12-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1461
id doaj-cd9324a9d9274255b5025f153af66308
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd9324a9d9274255b5025f153af663082020-11-24T23:26:16ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80501995-12-015141127111310.4102/hts.v51i4.14611205Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?Kobus van Rooyen0University of PretoriaThis article reflects upon the question of whether the offence of blasphemy is valid in terms of the Constitution of the Republic which guarantees equal protection and freedom of religion, opinion, conscience and belie! Blasphemy protects only the Christian and Judaic perceptions of God. Would a Muslim, for example, not be entitled to protection under a broadened offence? And does the offence not discriminate against religions not protected by blasphemy? The author contends that Parliament has a duty to either broaden the scope of blasphemy or to scrap the offence. He is, however, of the view that the offence is not, in itself, unconstitutional and that Parliament should, given the sensitivities in this sphere, not scrap the offence but rather protect the religious convictions of all sections of the population.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1461
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kobus van Rooyen
spellingShingle Kobus van Rooyen
Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
author_facet Kobus van Rooyen
author_sort Kobus van Rooyen
title Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
title_short Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
title_full Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
title_fullStr Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
title_full_unstemmed Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
title_sort does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the south african constitution?
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 1995-12-01
description This article reflects upon the question of whether the offence of blasphemy is valid in terms of the Constitution of the Republic which guarantees equal protection and freedom of religion, opinion, conscience and belie! Blasphemy protects only the Christian and Judaic perceptions of God. Would a Muslim, for example, not be entitled to protection under a broadened offence? And does the offence not discriminate against religions not protected by blasphemy? The author contends that Parliament has a duty to either broaden the scope of blasphemy or to scrap the offence. He is, however, of the view that the offence is not, in itself, unconstitutional and that Parliament should, given the sensitivities in this sphere, not scrap the offence but rather protect the religious convictions of all sections of the population.
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1461
work_keys_str_mv AT kobusvanrooyen doestheoffenceofblasphemyhaveafutureunderthesouthafricanconstitution
_version_ 1725555719387742208