Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?

Historians of mathematics have often noticed a singularity of their discipline: unlike physics, the history of mathematics does not proceed essentially by conjectures and refutations, but by a succession of reinterpretations of the past in order to include it into the actual state of knowledge. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lucien Vinciguerra
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Lille 2020-02-01
Series:Methodos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/7065
id doaj-cd90ff1bb1e84d3396001042bdc4994b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd90ff1bb1e84d3396001042bdc4994b2020-11-25T01:36:20ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792020-02-0120Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?Lucien VinciguerraHistorians of mathematics have often noticed a singularity of their discipline: unlike physics, the history of mathematics does not proceed essentially by conjectures and refutations, but by a succession of reinterpretations of the past in order to include it into the actual state of knowledge. This operation involves an act of reading. Taking as its starting point Husserl's theses in The Origin of Geometry on the role of writing in the historicity of mathematics, the article aims to analyze the conditions of possibility of this reading, related to the nature of the mathematical text : this reading involves three delimitations performed by the reader's eye: between true and false, between writing and image, between what is mathematical and what does not. The article illustrates this thesis by examining the status of the equation in the cartesian’s book of Geometry. It shows the links between the latter and the ideas that the philosopher develops on reading and on the nature of the sign. On this basis, it is possible to understand how Descartes could read a mathematical text, how this partly explains some points in his Geometry, but also how other readings of this Geometry can include it into the mathematics of later centuries.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/7065history of mathematicsHusserlPeletier du Man JacquesDescartesBachelardQuine
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucien Vinciguerra
spellingShingle Lucien Vinciguerra
Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
Methodos
history of mathematics
Husserl
Peletier du Man Jacques
Descartes
Bachelard
Quine
author_facet Lucien Vinciguerra
author_sort Lucien Vinciguerra
title Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
title_short Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
title_full Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
title_fullStr Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
title_full_unstemmed Lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
title_sort lectures mathématiques : sédimentation, réactivation ou partage ?
publisher Université de Lille
series Methodos
issn 1769-7379
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Historians of mathematics have often noticed a singularity of their discipline: unlike physics, the history of mathematics does not proceed essentially by conjectures and refutations, but by a succession of reinterpretations of the past in order to include it into the actual state of knowledge. This operation involves an act of reading. Taking as its starting point Husserl's theses in The Origin of Geometry on the role of writing in the historicity of mathematics, the article aims to analyze the conditions of possibility of this reading, related to the nature of the mathematical text : this reading involves three delimitations performed by the reader's eye: between true and false, between writing and image, between what is mathematical and what does not. The article illustrates this thesis by examining the status of the equation in the cartesian’s book of Geometry. It shows the links between the latter and the ideas that the philosopher develops on reading and on the nature of the sign. On this basis, it is possible to understand how Descartes could read a mathematical text, how this partly explains some points in his Geometry, but also how other readings of this Geometry can include it into the mathematics of later centuries.
topic history of mathematics
Husserl
Peletier du Man Jacques
Descartes
Bachelard
Quine
url http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/7065
work_keys_str_mv AT lucienvinciguerra lecturesmathematiquessedimentationreactivationoupartage
_version_ 1725063675423752192