Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types
Abstract Sweetpotato plays an important role in ensuring food security and household income sources for local communities in Ethiopia. It is dominantly grown in southern parts of Ethiopia. However, its production and productivity over the last few years has declined due to the limited access of qual...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Food and Energy Security |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.263 |
id |
doaj-cd7173bf69fc4790815df3d089dd0f06 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cd7173bf69fc4790815df3d089dd0f062021-03-01T09:46:10ZengWileyFood and Energy Security2048-36942021-02-01101n/an/a10.1002/fes3.263Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage typesTinsae Abrham0Hussien Mohammed Beshir1Ashenafi Haile2Shone Town Administration Environment and Forest Protection Office Shone EthiopiaSchool of Plant and Horticultural Sciences Hawassa University Hawassa EthiopiaSchool of Plant and Horticultural Sciences Hawassa University Hawassa EthiopiaAbstract Sweetpotato plays an important role in ensuring food security and household income sources for local communities in Ethiopia. It is dominantly grown in southern parts of Ethiopia. However, its production and productivity over the last few years has declined due to the limited access of quality planting materials at the onset of the rainy season, disease, and severe pest infestation. Therefore, it was imperative to carry out this study to identify the main constraints related to the recent decline of the crop in Misrak Badawacho District. The survey result revealed that many varieties of sweetpotato were grown in the district; mainly, Awassa‐83, Ogan‐Sagan, and Wolaita‐local were the most preferred variety by producers. The main sweetpotato production and storage constraints in the study district are as follows: rodents, disease and insect pests, heat and drought, shortage of quality planting materials, and absence of best methods for long‐term storage. Awassa‐83, Ogan‐Sagan and Wolaita‐local were evaluated under different storage types (straw, soil, ash, sawdust, and sand storage). The combination of Awassa‐83 variety and sand storage was performed better in percentage of decay, weight loss, and weevil damage, whereas length and number of vine per storage roots were performed better in the separate treatment. Thus, Awassa‐83 variety and sand storage can be recommended for maintaining the storage roots during dry periods and access of quality vines at the onset of the rainy season. More importantly, sand storage provides an opportunity to maintain the quality of sweetpotato storage roots for a long period of time and producers can easily and timely access quality vines at the onset of rainy season.https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.263constraintsplanting materialsstoragesweetpotatovariety |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tinsae Abrham Hussien Mohammed Beshir Ashenafi Haile |
spellingShingle |
Tinsae Abrham Hussien Mohammed Beshir Ashenafi Haile Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types Food and Energy Security constraints planting materials storage sweetpotato variety |
author_facet |
Tinsae Abrham Hussien Mohammed Beshir Ashenafi Haile |
author_sort |
Tinsae Abrham |
title |
Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types |
title_short |
Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types |
title_full |
Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types |
title_fullStr |
Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types |
title_sort |
sweetpotato production practices, constraints, and variety evaluation under different storage types |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Food and Energy Security |
issn |
2048-3694 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Sweetpotato plays an important role in ensuring food security and household income sources for local communities in Ethiopia. It is dominantly grown in southern parts of Ethiopia. However, its production and productivity over the last few years has declined due to the limited access of quality planting materials at the onset of the rainy season, disease, and severe pest infestation. Therefore, it was imperative to carry out this study to identify the main constraints related to the recent decline of the crop in Misrak Badawacho District. The survey result revealed that many varieties of sweetpotato were grown in the district; mainly, Awassa‐83, Ogan‐Sagan, and Wolaita‐local were the most preferred variety by producers. The main sweetpotato production and storage constraints in the study district are as follows: rodents, disease and insect pests, heat and drought, shortage of quality planting materials, and absence of best methods for long‐term storage. Awassa‐83, Ogan‐Sagan and Wolaita‐local were evaluated under different storage types (straw, soil, ash, sawdust, and sand storage). The combination of Awassa‐83 variety and sand storage was performed better in percentage of decay, weight loss, and weevil damage, whereas length and number of vine per storage roots were performed better in the separate treatment. Thus, Awassa‐83 variety and sand storage can be recommended for maintaining the storage roots during dry periods and access of quality vines at the onset of the rainy season. More importantly, sand storage provides an opportunity to maintain the quality of sweetpotato storage roots for a long period of time and producers can easily and timely access quality vines at the onset of rainy season. |
topic |
constraints planting materials storage sweetpotato variety |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.263 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tinsaeabrham sweetpotatoproductionpracticesconstraintsandvarietyevaluationunderdifferentstoragetypes AT hussienmohammedbeshir sweetpotatoproductionpracticesconstraintsandvarietyevaluationunderdifferentstoragetypes AT ashenafihaile sweetpotatoproductionpracticesconstraintsandvarietyevaluationunderdifferentstoragetypes |
_version_ |
1724246858284400640 |