Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1

The frequently used way of comparing two independent groups is to compare in terms of some measure of location such as mean. For non-normal and heteroscedastic cases, trimmed mean, median or some other robust measures of location can be used instead. However, determination of the differences in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gözde Navruz, Abdullah Fırat Özdemir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Anadolu University 2016-10-01
Series:Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology. A : Applied Sciences and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/aubtda/issue/24858/262662?publisher=anadolu
id doaj-cd63a419fdcd455882e16f713b5f6c17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd63a419fdcd455882e16f713b5f6c172020-11-24T23:34:42ZengAnadolu UniversityAnadolu University Journal of Science and Technology. A : Applied Sciences and Engineering1302-31602146-02052016-10-0117350651110.18038/btda.2057126Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1Gözde NavruzAbdullah Fırat ÖzdemirThe frequently used way of comparing two independent groups is to compare in terms of some measure of location such as mean. For non-normal and heteroscedastic cases, trimmed mean, median or some other robust measures of location can be used instead. However, determination of the differences in the tails of the groups might be of interest. For this reason, comparing the lower and upper quantiles becomes an important issue. In this study, Harrell-Davis estimator and the default quantile estimator of R are compared in terms of actual Type I error rates. When quantiles close to zero or one are compared with small sample sizes Gumbel's estimator, and when quantiles close to median are compared with large sample sizes Harrell Davis estimator saved actual Type I error rate better.http://dergipark.gov.tr/aubtda/issue/24858/262662?publisher=anadoluTwo independent groups Gumbel estimator Harrell Davis estimator Percentile bootstrap
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gözde Navruz
Abdullah Fırat Özdemir
spellingShingle Gözde Navruz
Abdullah Fırat Özdemir
Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1
Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology. A : Applied Sciences and Engineering
Two independent groups
Gumbel estimator
Harrell Davis estimator
Percentile bootstrap
author_facet Gözde Navruz
Abdullah Fırat Özdemir
author_sort Gözde Navruz
title Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1
title_short Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1
title_full Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1
title_fullStr Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1
title_full_unstemmed Gözde NAVRUZ 1, * , A. Fırat Özdemir1
title_sort gözde navruz 1, * , a. fırat özdemir1
publisher Anadolu University
series Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology. A : Applied Sciences and Engineering
issn 1302-3160
2146-0205
publishDate 2016-10-01
description The frequently used way of comparing two independent groups is to compare in terms of some measure of location such as mean. For non-normal and heteroscedastic cases, trimmed mean, median or some other robust measures of location can be used instead. However, determination of the differences in the tails of the groups might be of interest. For this reason, comparing the lower and upper quantiles becomes an important issue. In this study, Harrell-Davis estimator and the default quantile estimator of R are compared in terms of actual Type I error rates. When quantiles close to zero or one are compared with small sample sizes Gumbel's estimator, and when quantiles close to median are compared with large sample sizes Harrell Davis estimator saved actual Type I error rate better.
topic Two independent groups
Gumbel estimator
Harrell Davis estimator
Percentile bootstrap
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/aubtda/issue/24858/262662?publisher=anadolu
work_keys_str_mv AT gozdenavruz gozdenavruz1afıratozdemir1
AT abdullahfıratozdemir gozdenavruz1afıratozdemir1
_version_ 1725528021157281792