Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence

Introduction: Helical rim keloids occur commonly following ear piercings, trauma and previous surgeries and can be disfiguring. Many techniques have been developed to treated these disfiguring lesions with varying successes, however, individuals prone to developing keloids inadvertently recur despit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James W.M. Kwek, T.S. Lee, Ian C.Y. Loh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-03-01
Series:JPRAS Open
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587818300512
id doaj-cd55ae4286e348b4b12f0e5acf91244a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd55ae4286e348b4b12f0e5acf91244a2020-11-25T00:41:11ZengElsevierJPRAS Open2352-58782019-03-01196166Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrenceJames W.M. Kwek0T.S. Lee1Ian C.Y. Loh2Corresponding author.; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889, SingaporeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889, SingaporeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889, SingaporeIntroduction: Helical rim keloids occur commonly following ear piercings, trauma and previous surgeries and can be disfiguring. Many techniques have been developed to treated these disfiguring lesions with varying successes, however, individuals prone to developing keloids inadvertently recur despite best efforts. Objective: To determine whether helical rim advancement flap reconstruction following helical rim keloid excision can reduce recurrences. Design: Case series followed up to 2 years. Setting: Single Centre Tertiary Hospital Facial Plastics Service. Participants: All patients who consented to helical rim advancement reconstruction after keloid excision. Results: The authors report a series of 7 patients with helical rim keloids ranging from 1.2 cm to 5 cm in widest diameter treated with keloid excision and reconstruction with helical rim advancement flap technique. There were no recurrences within a mean of about 19 months post-operatively. Most patients report satisfaction with the cosmetic end-result. Discussion: From the authors’ experience, helical rim advancement reconstruction following excision of keloids about 2.5 cm in widest diameter is an excellent tension-free option to avoid recurrence of helical rim keloids. Wound tension is a key risk factor for keloid formation. We hypothesise that the reason why there was no recurrence is because in helical rim advancement flap reconstruction, the underlying helical rim takes all the tension of closure off the dermis, resulting in tension-free skin closure. Conclusion: Helical rim advancement flap reconstruction is a viable technique to avoid recurrence and minimise cosmetic deformities of the pinna for selected helical rim keloids. Keywords: Keloid, Ear, Pinna, Advancement flap, Antia-Buchhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587818300512
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James W.M. Kwek
T.S. Lee
Ian C.Y. Loh
spellingShingle James W.M. Kwek
T.S. Lee
Ian C.Y. Loh
Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence
JPRAS Open
author_facet James W.M. Kwek
T.S. Lee
Ian C.Y. Loh
author_sort James W.M. Kwek
title Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence
title_short Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence
title_full Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence
title_fullStr Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence
title_full_unstemmed Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence
title_sort helical rim advancement – a technique to avoid keloid recurrence
publisher Elsevier
series JPRAS Open
issn 2352-5878
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Introduction: Helical rim keloids occur commonly following ear piercings, trauma and previous surgeries and can be disfiguring. Many techniques have been developed to treated these disfiguring lesions with varying successes, however, individuals prone to developing keloids inadvertently recur despite best efforts. Objective: To determine whether helical rim advancement flap reconstruction following helical rim keloid excision can reduce recurrences. Design: Case series followed up to 2 years. Setting: Single Centre Tertiary Hospital Facial Plastics Service. Participants: All patients who consented to helical rim advancement reconstruction after keloid excision. Results: The authors report a series of 7 patients with helical rim keloids ranging from 1.2 cm to 5 cm in widest diameter treated with keloid excision and reconstruction with helical rim advancement flap technique. There were no recurrences within a mean of about 19 months post-operatively. Most patients report satisfaction with the cosmetic end-result. Discussion: From the authors’ experience, helical rim advancement reconstruction following excision of keloids about 2.5 cm in widest diameter is an excellent tension-free option to avoid recurrence of helical rim keloids. Wound tension is a key risk factor for keloid formation. We hypothesise that the reason why there was no recurrence is because in helical rim advancement flap reconstruction, the underlying helical rim takes all the tension of closure off the dermis, resulting in tension-free skin closure. Conclusion: Helical rim advancement flap reconstruction is a viable technique to avoid recurrence and minimise cosmetic deformities of the pinna for selected helical rim keloids. Keywords: Keloid, Ear, Pinna, Advancement flap, Antia-Buch
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587818300512
work_keys_str_mv AT jameswmkwek helicalrimadvancementatechniquetoavoidkeloidrecurrence
AT tslee helicalrimadvancementatechniquetoavoidkeloidrecurrence
AT iancyloh helicalrimadvancementatechniquetoavoidkeloidrecurrence
_version_ 1725286799537864704