The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment

On 15 November 2017, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion OC-23/17 on the relationship between human rights and the environment. The opinion responded to a request made by Colombia pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights regarding extrater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Przemysław Siwior
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2021-08-01
Series:Review of European and Comparative Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/recl/article/view/11915
id doaj-cd4e3f6edfd6473db0ae9938fc8db15b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd4e3f6edfd6473db0ae9938fc8db15b2021-08-23T11:08:41ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinReview of European and Comparative Law2545-384X2021-08-0146310.31743/recl.11915The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the EnvironmentPrzemysław Siwior0Institute of Environmental Protection, National Research Institute On 15 November 2017, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion OC-23/17 on the relationship between human rights and the environment. The opinion responded to a request made by Colombia pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction of state parties to the Convention resulting from mega-infrastructure projects in the Greater Caribbean region. The purpose of this article is to discuss the general issues dealt with by the Court, concentrating on the significance of this Advisory Opinion for international law. The opinion contains two main interesting aspects. First, in the light of the opinion, states are responsible for the environmental damage they cause, regardless of whether it occurs within their borders or beyond them. Second, the Advisory Opinion recognizes that the right to a healthy environment is an autonomous, fundamental human right that shall be protected. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/recl/article/view/11915advisory opinion, IACtHR, human rights, environment, extraterritorial jurisdiction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Przemysław Siwior
spellingShingle Przemysław Siwior
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment
Review of European and Comparative Law
advisory opinion, IACtHR, human rights, environment, extraterritorial jurisdiction
author_facet Przemysław Siwior
author_sort Przemysław Siwior
title The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment
title_short The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment
title_full The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment
title_fullStr The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment
title_full_unstemmed The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment
title_sort inter-american court of human rights advisory opinion oc-23/17 on the relationship between human rights and the environment
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
series Review of European and Comparative Law
issn 2545-384X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description On 15 November 2017, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion OC-23/17 on the relationship between human rights and the environment. The opinion responded to a request made by Colombia pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction of state parties to the Convention resulting from mega-infrastructure projects in the Greater Caribbean region. The purpose of this article is to discuss the general issues dealt with by the Court, concentrating on the significance of this Advisory Opinion for international law. The opinion contains two main interesting aspects. First, in the light of the opinion, states are responsible for the environmental damage they cause, regardless of whether it occurs within their borders or beyond them. Second, the Advisory Opinion recognizes that the right to a healthy environment is an autonomous, fundamental human right that shall be protected.
topic advisory opinion, IACtHR, human rights, environment, extraterritorial jurisdiction
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/recl/article/view/11915
work_keys_str_mv AT przemysławsiwior theinteramericancourtofhumanrightsadvisoryopinionoc2317ontherelationshipbetweenhumanrightsandtheenvironment
AT przemysławsiwior interamericancourtofhumanrightsadvisoryopinionoc2317ontherelationshipbetweenhumanrightsandtheenvironment
_version_ 1721198543911256064