The Role of Jurisprudence Scholars in the Reformation and the Development of Lexical Issues (Compositional and Predicative Sentences as samples)
It seems that the Arabic linguists are unfamiliar with the literal language that is not available to many of them, so that they will be able to find out in this field of jurisprudence discussions in lexical and inventive research. While they have a great role to play in lexical theory, and this is t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
University of Isfahan
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Research in Arabic Language |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://rall.ui.ac.ir/article_22377_bcc23743f7a65e088fcceff843d9087a.pdf |
Summary: | It seems that the Arabic linguists are unfamiliar with the literal language that is not available to many of them, so that they will be able to find out in this field of jurisprudence discussions in lexical and inventive research. While they have a great role to play in lexical theory, and this is the discussion of the implications of sentences and the opposite of it. Scientists have studied some aspects of semantics (the argumentation), but these studies did not cover all the efforts of the principals in this regard. This research has been the subject of a dissertation, newsletter and interview between the news and the subject, and they have been implemented in the light of the prominent literary and verbal views that resulted in five theories, each with its own basis and arguments. Then the controversy over the famous comments of the syntacticians was made by Razi Estar Abadi. Then, Shahid Sadr's controversy on the theory of unity which is also the proof of the two sentences of the writings, which is the opinion of Kefayeh, was investigated. It has been noted that there is a difference between the two sentences even in their abstract status. Khoei believes in the implication of compositional and predicative sentence expressing sensual, like inform what happened in predicative sentence and not inform in compositional sentence that rejected by Shahid Sadr then criticizes four protests of Khoei to the famous opinion that it’s same implication of two sentences over full relation and has approved the famous opinion. Finally Shahid Sadr believes in the opinion of comparative relation. The comparative relation shares between two notions, first, the comparative relation in terms of the condition of realization that it’s in predicative sentence, second, to hold true in question world as its question in sentence, third, to hold true in aspiration world in aspiration sentence. Hashemi Shahroudi continued the way of his teacher (Shahid Sadr) and examined the issues of teacher and believe in the content of verb clause in creating relation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2008-6466 2322-4649 |