Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia

Abstract Background The Opioid Reduction Act (SB 273) took effect in West Virginia in June 2018. This legislation limited ongoing chronic opioid prescriptions to 30 days’ supply, and first-time opioid prescriptions to 7 days’ supply for surgeons and 3 days’ for emergency rooms and dentists. The purp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cara L. Sedney, Maryam Khodaverdi, Robin Pollini, Patricia Dekeseredy, Nathan Wood, Treah Haggerty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00349-y
id doaj-cd3cfa6ea89645bd9b5176dd2afc4ef5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd3cfa6ea89645bd9b5176dd2afc4ef52021-02-07T12:21:58ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2021-02-0116111210.1186/s13011-021-00349-yAssessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West VirginiaCara L. Sedney0Maryam Khodaverdi1Robin Pollini2Patricia Dekeseredy3Nathan Wood4Treah Haggerty5School of Medicine, West Virginia UniversityWest Virginia Clinical and Translational Science InstituteDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, West Virginia UniversitySchool of Medicine, West Virginia UniversityWest Virginia Board of PharmacySchool of Medicine, West Virginia UniversityAbstract Background The Opioid Reduction Act (SB 273) took effect in West Virginia in June 2018. This legislation limited ongoing chronic opioid prescriptions to 30 days’ supply, and first-time opioid prescriptions to 7 days’ supply for surgeons and 3 days’ for emergency rooms and dentists. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of this legislation on reducing opioid prescriptions in West Virginia, with the goal of informing future similar policy efforts. Methods Data were requested from the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) including overall number of opioid prescriptions, number of first-time opioid prescriptions, average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and prescription duration (expressed as “days’ supply”) given to adults during the 64 week time periods before and after legislation enactment. Statistical analysis was done utilizing an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) interrupted time series analysis to assess impact of both legislation announcement and enactment while controlling secular trends and considering autocorrelation trends. Benzodiazepine prescriptions were utilized as a control. Results Our analysis demonstrates a significant decrease in overall state opioid prescribing as well as a small change in average daily MME associated with the date of the legislation’s enactment when considering serial correlation in the time series and accounting for pre-intervention trends. There was no such association found with benzodiazepine prescriptions. Conclusion Results of the current study suggest that SB 273 was associated with an average 22.1% decrease of overall opioid prescriptions and a small change in average daily MME relative to the date of legislative implementation in West Virginia. There was, however, no association of the legislation on first-time opioid prescriptions or days’ supply of opioid medication, and all variables were trending downward prior to implementation of SB 273. The control demonstrated no relationship to the law.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00349-yOpioidsLawPrescription opioidsOpiatesInterrupted time series
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cara L. Sedney
Maryam Khodaverdi
Robin Pollini
Patricia Dekeseredy
Nathan Wood
Treah Haggerty
spellingShingle Cara L. Sedney
Maryam Khodaverdi
Robin Pollini
Patricia Dekeseredy
Nathan Wood
Treah Haggerty
Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Opioids
Law
Prescription opioids
Opiates
Interrupted time series
author_facet Cara L. Sedney
Maryam Khodaverdi
Robin Pollini
Patricia Dekeseredy
Nathan Wood
Treah Haggerty
author_sort Cara L. Sedney
title Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia
title_short Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia
title_full Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia
title_sort assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in west virginia
publisher BMC
series Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
issn 1747-597X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Background The Opioid Reduction Act (SB 273) took effect in West Virginia in June 2018. This legislation limited ongoing chronic opioid prescriptions to 30 days’ supply, and first-time opioid prescriptions to 7 days’ supply for surgeons and 3 days’ for emergency rooms and dentists. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of this legislation on reducing opioid prescriptions in West Virginia, with the goal of informing future similar policy efforts. Methods Data were requested from the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) including overall number of opioid prescriptions, number of first-time opioid prescriptions, average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and prescription duration (expressed as “days’ supply”) given to adults during the 64 week time periods before and after legislation enactment. Statistical analysis was done utilizing an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) interrupted time series analysis to assess impact of both legislation announcement and enactment while controlling secular trends and considering autocorrelation trends. Benzodiazepine prescriptions were utilized as a control. Results Our analysis demonstrates a significant decrease in overall state opioid prescribing as well as a small change in average daily MME associated with the date of the legislation’s enactment when considering serial correlation in the time series and accounting for pre-intervention trends. There was no such association found with benzodiazepine prescriptions. Conclusion Results of the current study suggest that SB 273 was associated with an average 22.1% decrease of overall opioid prescriptions and a small change in average daily MME relative to the date of legislative implementation in West Virginia. There was, however, no association of the legislation on first-time opioid prescriptions or days’ supply of opioid medication, and all variables were trending downward prior to implementation of SB 273. The control demonstrated no relationship to the law.
topic Opioids
Law
Prescription opioids
Opiates
Interrupted time series
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00349-y
work_keys_str_mv AT caralsedney assessingtheimpactofarestrictiveopioidprescribinglawinwestvirginia
AT maryamkhodaverdi assessingtheimpactofarestrictiveopioidprescribinglawinwestvirginia
AT robinpollini assessingtheimpactofarestrictiveopioidprescribinglawinwestvirginia
AT patriciadekeseredy assessingtheimpactofarestrictiveopioidprescribinglawinwestvirginia
AT nathanwood assessingtheimpactofarestrictiveopioidprescribinglawinwestvirginia
AT treahhaggerty assessingtheimpactofarestrictiveopioidprescribinglawinwestvirginia
_version_ 1724281375836602368