Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?

Abstract Background The effectiveness of helmet use in preventing or reducing the severity of head injuries has been largely demonstrated. However, the effectiveness of different types of helmets in reducing facial or non-facial head injuries has received much less attention. Methods A postal survey...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan Wu, Marine Dufournet, Jean-Louis Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Injury Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-019-0197-8
id doaj-cd30ec07ac30445f8507bab1427ab325
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd30ec07ac30445f8507bab1427ab3252020-11-25T03:06:12ZengBMCInjury Epidemiology2197-17142019-06-01611910.1186/s40621-019-0197-8Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?Dan Wu0Marine Dufournet1Jean-Louis Martin2Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE UMR_T 9405Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE UMR_T 9405Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE UMR_T 9405Abstract Background The effectiveness of helmet use in preventing or reducing the severity of head injuries has been largely demonstrated. However, the effectiveness of different types of helmets in reducing facial or non-facial head injuries has received much less attention. Methods A postal survey on motorized two-wheeler crashes was conducted in 2016. 7148 riders of motorized two-wheelers (MTW) injured in a crash between 2010 and 2014 and identified in the Rhône Trauma Registry were invited to complete a questionnaire in order to collect detailed information about their accidents. The analysis was based on a population of 405 helmeted riders who declared having received an impact on the head. Facial and non-facial head injury risks were estimated according to helmet type (full face or other) by logistic regression, controlled for type of object hit by the head (and gender for risk of non-facial head injury), and weighted to take nonresponse into account. Results Three-quarter of helmeted MTW drivers were wearing a full-face helmet at the time of the accident. Victims wearing a full-face helmet were about three times less likely to have sustained injury to the face, compared to victims wearing another type of helmet (adjusted OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.11–0.83). On the other hand, the presence of non-facial head injury did not vary significantly according to whether a full-face or other helmet was worn (adjusted OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.33–2.13). Conclusions Our study suggests that full-face helmets provide better facial protection for MTW users compared to other types of helmets, whereas there is no evidence of any difference in protection afforded the skull or the brain.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-019-0197-8MTW (motorized two-wheeler)Helmet typeFacial injuryNon-facial head injuryHead impact
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dan Wu
Marine Dufournet
Jean-Louis Martin
spellingShingle Dan Wu
Marine Dufournet
Jean-Louis Martin
Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
Injury Epidemiology
MTW (motorized two-wheeler)
Helmet type
Facial injury
Non-facial head injury
Head impact
author_facet Dan Wu
Marine Dufournet
Jean-Louis Martin
author_sort Dan Wu
title Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
title_short Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
title_full Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
title_fullStr Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
title_full_unstemmed Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
title_sort does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?
publisher BMC
series Injury Epidemiology
issn 2197-1714
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background The effectiveness of helmet use in preventing or reducing the severity of head injuries has been largely demonstrated. However, the effectiveness of different types of helmets in reducing facial or non-facial head injuries has received much less attention. Methods A postal survey on motorized two-wheeler crashes was conducted in 2016. 7148 riders of motorized two-wheelers (MTW) injured in a crash between 2010 and 2014 and identified in the Rhône Trauma Registry were invited to complete a questionnaire in order to collect detailed information about their accidents. The analysis was based on a population of 405 helmeted riders who declared having received an impact on the head. Facial and non-facial head injury risks were estimated according to helmet type (full face or other) by logistic regression, controlled for type of object hit by the head (and gender for risk of non-facial head injury), and weighted to take nonresponse into account. Results Three-quarter of helmeted MTW drivers were wearing a full-face helmet at the time of the accident. Victims wearing a full-face helmet were about three times less likely to have sustained injury to the face, compared to victims wearing another type of helmet (adjusted OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.11–0.83). On the other hand, the presence of non-facial head injury did not vary significantly according to whether a full-face or other helmet was worn (adjusted OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.33–2.13). Conclusions Our study suggests that full-face helmets provide better facial protection for MTW users compared to other types of helmets, whereas there is no evidence of any difference in protection afforded the skull or the brain.
topic MTW (motorized two-wheeler)
Helmet type
Facial injury
Non-facial head injury
Head impact
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-019-0197-8
work_keys_str_mv AT danwu doesafullfacehelmeteffectivelyprotectagainstfacialinjuries
AT marinedufournet doesafullfacehelmeteffectivelyprotectagainstfacialinjuries
AT jeanlouismartin doesafullfacehelmeteffectivelyprotectagainstfacialinjuries
_version_ 1724674712556011520